Here's Scott Jennings' Take on Trump's White House Correspondents' Association Dinner Spee...
We Might Have Some More Ballot Drama in Maine
How Alaska Is Cleaning Up Its Voter Rolls
Former MSNBC Analyst Admits Republicans Were Right About This Regarding Our Elections
GOP Sends Letter to NJ Governor: What the Hell Happened to Your Voter...
Democrats Do Not Speak for All Women
The Kind of People Who Run for Government Office
Black-On-White Crime Remains Epidemic
On National Parents’ Day, Remember: Parents—Not the State—Know and Love Their Children Bes...
The Unlikely Incubators of Liberty
Four Men Plead Guilty in $2.2 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Troy Jackson Crowned As New Maine Senate Nominee
We Now Have the Truth About That Viral ICE Story That Sparked Massive...
The Process to Replace Graham Platner Is Already Off to a Rough Start...
The Conservative Case for American Cement
Notebook

One State's Gun Control Initiative Will Appear On The November Ballot Despite Questionable Practices

One State's Gun Control Initiative Will Appear On The November Ballot Despite Questionable Practices

The Washington State Supreme Court on Friday overturned a lower court's decision on the state's controversial gun control ballot initiative, I-1639. The Court ruled unanimously that the initiative must appear on the November ballot.

Advertisement

The National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Second Amendment Foundation, along with a handful of individuals, previously challenged the initiative's state constitutionality. According to NRA and SAF, the ballot initiative's supporters didn't follow state laws regarding proper formatting. 

"The problem with the petitions is that they failed to underline new law and strike through removed law so that the reader could not know the current law, added law and subtracted law," Alan Gottlieb, Founder and Executive Director of SAF, previously told Townhall.

"If they are so careless about knowing what is, or is not, shown on their own petitions, how is anyone else supposed to know? They’re asking people to sign an initiative that is difficult, if not impossible to read,” Gottlieb said. “And now we’ve discovered that even if people can read the fine print, it does not appear to be a ‘true and correct copy’ of the proposed measure as submitted to the state.

According to the Court, the statute the NRA and SAF referenced is "narrow" and
"it does not allow for preelection judicial review of the form, process, substance, or constitutionality of an initiative petition."

The Court also said the statute is focused solely on the validity of signatures and "is limited to enforcing the number-of-signature requirements and is not available where, as here, there is no actual challenge to the counting of signatures."

Advertisement

Gottlieb said the Court skirted their "abrogated its duty to protect the state constitution and state election law" with the decision. 

"The court never addressed the merits of the complaints against I-1639, instead choosing to ignore the law," Gottlieb said in a statement. “Essentially, the court has unanimously decided to nullify the state election law. Henceforth, if an initiative petition is left blank on the reverse side by its sponsor, there is no way that can be challenged for not complying with state law.”

According to the Alliance for Gun Responsibility, if passed, I-1639 would:
• Raise the age someone can purchase a rifle to 21.
• Create an "enhanced background check system similar to what is used for handguns."
• Require a person to complete a firearms safety training course.
• Create a common stand for secure gun storage.

The NRA did not respond to Townhall's request for comment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement