This Is Vengeance
Scott Jennings Delivered Another Line That Shut Down the Dems on CNN
DHS Just Made Self-Deportation More Attractive for the Christmas Season
South Carolina Town Committee Defies Mayor to Keep Christ in Christmas
Does Jared Polis Really Think Colorado 'Protects Freedoms'?
California Businesses Are Shouldering the State's Unpaid $20 Billion COVID Debt
Western Governments Call Them Refugees — Their Travel Habits Say Otherwise
Historic Minneapolis Bar Closes, and Guess What It'll Be Converted Into Now
Always a Penal Colony: Check Out Why Australian Police Arrested a Man at...
Here's Why a Beloved Pennsylvania School Bus Driver Was Fired
Pearl Harbor Survivor Ira 'Ike' Schab Dies Aged 105
President Trump to Make 'Major Announcement' Today With War Secretary Hegseth, Navy Secret...
Russian General Killed in Moscow Car Bombing. How Will This Impact Trump's Peace...
Christmas Comes Early for Illegal Immigrants As Trump Admin Triples Self-Deportation Bonus
Tulsi Gabbard Warns That Islamist Ideology Is the Greatest Threat to Freedom in...
Notebook

Judge Rules In Favor of Gun Rights Groups, Tosses Out Controversial Ballot Initiative

Gun rights groups in Washington State have spent the last few months fighting gun control ballot initiative I-1639 which would create stricter gun laws. A Thurston County Superior Court judge on Friday, however, ruled in favor of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF). The judge ordered a writ of mandamus to prevent I-1639 from appearing on the November ballot.

Advertisement

SAF and the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) previously challenged the constitutionality behind the initiative because questions were raised about whether or not the petition's format complies with state law.  

SAF Founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb previously told Townhall that I-1639's signature petitions "failed to underline new law and strike through removed law so that the reader could not know the current law, added law and subtracted law."

Judge James Dixon, who ruled in the case, was very clear about his position. “Frankly, this court does not struggle with this issue,” Dixon said. The law, he said, requires that petitions “must have a readable, full, true, correct copy of the proposed measure.”

“We got our day in court,” Gottlieb said. “We expected it. We won.”

“We got involved because I-1639 tramples on the rights of Washington state voters, and because the way these anti-gun activists went about pushing their agenda was egregious. We applaud this decision, and will remain vigilant in protecting the constitutional freedoms of all Americans," NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox said in a statement.

Advertisement

The ballot innovative, if passed, would:
• Raise the age someone can purchase a rifle to 21.
• Create an "enhanced background check system similar to what is used for handguns."
• Require a person to complete a firearms safety training course.
• Create a common stand for secure gun storage.

Those behind the initiative immediately challenged Dixon's ruling, which will now go to the State Supreme Court. 

“We’re confident that the Supreme Court will reverse” the ruling, Greg Wong, an attorney for the campaign, told the Seattle Times. According to Wong, other initiatives have moved to the ballot despite 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement