Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Biden Administration Hurls Israel Under the Bus Again
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
Here's Where Speaker Mike Johnson Stands on Abortion
Trump Addresses the Very Real Chance of Him Going to Jail
Yes, Jen Psaki Really Said This About Biden Cutting Off Weapons Supply to...
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
Notebook

A Professor Attempts to Indoctrinate a Student But Fails Miserably

My alma mater, Northern Arizona University (NAU), came under fire after a student, Cailin Jeffers, had a point taken off of a paper, because she used the word "mankind" instead of "humanity."

Advertisement

Campus Reform obtained copies of an email Jeffers received from Dr. Anne Scott, the professor who docked points on the student's paper.

Seriously? Since when is using the term "mankind" political? I could maybe understand the professor wanting to use "gender-neutral" language, if Jeffers was enrolled in a women's and genders studies class; but an English class is a bit absurd. 

After all, the term "mankind" literally means "the human race."

To make matters even worse, Dr. Scott sent a mass email to the class about her student's use of "diction" - warning that other grades could suffer. 

I don't understand liberal propaganda like this. It's a word. It's in the dictionary. It has a meaning. Just because you're construing a word to mean something completely different, doesn't mean the definition has changed - no matter how much you advocate for that change.

"In the English Dept. (and in almost all universities, and for at least 25 years now), we acknowledge this fact about language and we want our students to respect the nuances of meaning that words implicitly have, the assumptions we make, often erroneously, about what these words may mean for the general public, and to be sensitive to our word choices for the sake of writing dispassionately and objectively in our classes," Dr. Scott wrote in an email to her students.

Advertisement

Translation: You're in a university class, on a college campus and you must respect the safe space we've created here. If you challenge it, without even trying, then you're doing something wrong.

Translation number two: Universities and colleges across the country have been trying to indoctrinate our youth for at least 25 years, and we're not about to stop now. Sit down, shut up and accept what we're telling you...because we have degrees that say we're "experts" on anything and everything.


Do students now need to ask every author what their preferred pronoun is? What about those authors that are dead? 

This is the kind of liberal indoctrination that absolutely irritates me. It was going to school at NAU and being involved in political activism that reaffirmed two things for me: one, I'm a conservative; and two, I will do everything in my power to make sure conservative voices are heard a predominantly leftist safe haven. 

NAU, you taught me a lot, but one thing you didn't do was indoctrinate me. And I will call you out, just like I do with every case of liberal propaganda and abuse.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement