This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
OPINION

How Price Gouging Laws Will Make Hurricane Dorian Even More Destructive

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

As Hurricane Dorian stays on course to blast parts of the U.S., the National Hurricane Center has urged Floridians to brace themselves for trouble. Florida’s Attorney General Ashley Moody has sprung to action, announcing that the state government will activate its price gouging hotline to enforce its anti-price gouging law — one meant to prevent desperate Floridians from being overcharged for essential goods, like water and generators. And it certainly sounds like the humane way to go, but it could very well end up doing far more harm than good.

Advertisement

States in Dorian’s path — Florida, Georgia, and the Carolinas — each have some form of an anti-price gouging statute in worry that profit-hungry businesses may take advantage of the situation and make affordable products suddenly unaffordable.

But by putting a ceiling on prices for goods, these states are messing with the current system that makes these goods plentiful. After all, high prices in a particular area signal to entrepreneurs and businesses that there’s gold to mine there, so they’ll respond to those opportunities by entering that market. Someone who sells gallons of water might drive their product from Virginia to Florida if they can make $50 dollars a case, but they very well may stay home if they can only make $10. Sure, it might sound like corporate greed, but letting them make that extra money will likely result in a significant increase in those goods and services — a sorely-needed uptick in times of crisis.

As new sellers continue entering the market, prices will inevitably be driven down, mitigating against the very prices that anti-price gouging laws deem “unconscionable.” 

Dr. Steve Horwitz, Professor of Free Enterprise at Ball State University, says this isn’t — of course — a perfect system. But it’s still the best we have. “We have no other way of making sure that increases in the demand for water, gas, etc. are translated into increases in supply. If you don’t want to run out of supplies, you need to let prices do their job,” he told me.

Advertisement

The cost of not letting prices do their job is pretty high. In fact, some economists estimate that if there had been a national price-gouging law at the time of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the economic losses they caused would have been increased by nearly two billion dollars.

Not only do prices serve as a kind of Bat-Signal for essential goods and services, they also play an important role in the allocation of these important resources. At the end of the day, higher prices prevent people from overusing. When prices increase, consumers think a little harder about what they buy and reallocate their funds to reflect their priorities, cutting back on the things they consider more frivolous. This helps make sure people aren’t taking more than they really need — which isn’t a big deal until every drop of fresh water in a disaster area counts.

But when prices can’t rise, people don’t have a reason to change their behavior. A person who only really needs one case of water may only buy one for $50, but they may buy three for $10. Price increases force people to make tough choices and cut back their spending habits to focus on what’s essential. This ensures that the already heavily-constricted supply of goods doesn’t deplete even faster.

Regardless of how one might feel about “price gouging” behavior or the people who engage in it, the policy should be designed to create the best outcomes possible. Anti-price gouging laws are often passed with the best of intentions, but intentions don’t put food on the table. These laws will likely make the situation far worse and magnify the damage rendered by Hurricane Dorian. After all, a $10 cap on the price of water doesn’t actually do these people well if there isn’t any water to buy. 

Advertisement

Trace Mitchell is a Young Voices contributor, Research Assistant with the Liberty and Law Center at George Mason University, and JD candidate at the Antonin Scalia Law School. His work has appeared in the American Banker, Chicago Tribune, Houston Chronicle, and Orange County Register.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement