Trump Just Made a Major Announcement About Iran
Florida Attorney General Takes Bold Stance on Gun Rights Despite Criticism From Prosecutor...
Fed Investigate Why Millions Vanished in This City's Migrant Shelter Program
This Outlet Claims the Bullet Used to Kill Charlie Kirk Didn't Match Suspect's...
Guess Which Demographic Group Is Throwing Support Behind the Reform UK Party
A Palm Beach Election Volunteer Was Arrested Days After a Special Election and...
SCOTUS Rules 8-1 Against Colorado's Conversion Therapy Ban
Rahm Emanuel Has Plans for ICE Funding, and It Doesn't Involve Enforcing Immigration...
A Thief’s Desperate Request
The Daily Mail Fuels Charlie Kirk Conspiracy Theories With Ignorant X Post
Ben Ferguson: It's Almost Like the Democratic Party Went to AI and Said...
Nick Shirley Drops a Teaser for Part Two of His Fraud Investigation in...
Fidel Castro’s Grandson Says He’s a Capitalist and That He Would Strike a...
Jamie Dimon: Winning in Iran Matters More Than What Happens to the Market
Chris Cuomo Gets Reality Check From a Former Political Prisoner of the Iranian...
OPINION

Big Citi Hack Reveals Ugly Truth About Banks

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Big Citi Hack Reveals Ugly Truth About Banks
(Newser) – The massive data breach at Citigroup has alarmed customers, angered lawmakers, and sparked debate on whether big banks are spending enough money on protecting their customers' information, the New York Times finds. Credit card companies have devoted their resources to preventing fraud from occurring when data is stolen and not invested enough in preventing data breaches from occurring in the first place, analysts say. While banks have gotten better at curtailing fraud—today, it costs banks 5 cents of every $100 changed, down from 15 cents in 1992—some say banks have little reason to try to shrink that even more.
Advertisement

That's because fraud can actually be a source of income, thanks to charge-back fees for fraudulent purchases, and the fact that it's the retailer who often assumes the cost of improperly bought items. And so the embedded-chip system used in much of Europe and Asia has not been adopted by US firms, who argue that retailers don't want to invest heavily in upgrading their card readers. Technology to encrypt data as it flows across the payment system has also been shunned by most firms. "Unfortunately, some companies look at breaches as the cost of doing business,” says the chief information of Heartland Payment Systems, which overhauled its systems after a massive breach in 2008. “That’s not the right way to look at it. You need to be as secure as you possibly can be."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement