It Looks Like Chris Murphy Fell for Iranian Propaganda After Cheering on Tehran...
Why the Latest Talks With Iran Got Stalled
Leftist Group That Falsely Branded Conservatives as 'Extremists' Could Face Criminal Charg...
Corrupt Democrat Announces Resignation Hours After Saying She Won't Step Down
Democratic Lawmaker Refuses to Resign After Facing Indictment for Stealing FEMA Cash
You're Gonna Laugh When You Find Out What Tim Walz Is Up to...
Iranian Supreme Leader Sidelined As Military Takes More Control
ICE Confirms an Illegal Immigrant From Venezuela Bludgeoned a Co-Worker to Death in...
The U.S. Is Still Blowing Up Narco Terrorist Vessels in the Caribbean
Illegal Immigrant Who Assaulted Nine High School Girls in VA Learns His Fate...
Check Out Cory Booker's Unhinged Speech at the Michigan Democratic Women's Caucus
President Trump Rips Into 'Paper Tiger' NATO While Lauding Allied Gulf States
Secretary Markwayne Mullin Warns Emergency Funding for DHS Is Set to Run Out...
President Trump Lays Into the Supreme Court Over Their Tariff Ruling
General Keane Says We Are Watching the Disarray of Iranian Leadership Play Out...
OPINION

Understanding the Revolutions of 2011

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Understanding the Revolutions of 2011
The wave of revolutions sweeping the Middle East bears a striking resemblance to previous political earthquakes. As in Europe in 1848, rising food prices and high unemployment have fueled popular protests from Morocco to Oman. As in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in 1989, frustration with closed, corrupt, and unresponsive political systems has led to defections among elites and the fall of once powerful regimes in Tunisia, Egypt, and perhaps Libya. Yet 1848 and 1989 are not the right analogies for this past winter's events. The revolutions of 1848 sought to overturn traditional monarchies, and those in 1989 were aimed at toppling communist governments. The revolutions of 2011 are fighting something quite different: "sultanistic" dictatorships. Although such regimes often appear unshakable, they are actually highly vulnerable, because the very strategies they use to stay in power make them brittle, not resilient. It is no coincidence that although popular protests have shaken much of the Middle East, the only revolutions to succeed so far -- those in Tunisia and Egypt -- have been against modern sultans. For a revolution to succeed, a number of factors have to come together. The government must appear so irremediably unjust or inept that it is widely viewed as a threat to the country's future; elites (especially in the military) must be alienated from the state and no longer willing to defend it; a broad-based section of the population, spanning ethnic and religious groups and socioeconomic classes, must mobilize; and international powers must either refuse to step in to defend the government or constrain it from using maximum force to defend itself.
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement