Trump Just Made a Major Announcement About Iran
Florida Attorney General Takes Bold Stance on Gun Rights Despite Criticism From Prosecutor...
Fed Investigate Why Millions Vanished in This City's Migrant Shelter Program
This Outlet Claims the Bullet Used to Kill Charlie Kirk Didn't Match Suspect's...
Guess Which Demographic Group Is Throwing Support Behind the Reform UK Party
A Palm Beach Election Volunteer Was Arrested Days After a Special Election and...
SCOTUS Rules 8-1 Against Colorado's Conversion Therapy Ban
Rahm Emanuel Has Plans for ICE Funding, and It Doesn't Involve Enforcing Immigration...
A Thief’s Desperate Request
The Daily Mail Fuels Charlie Kirk Conspiracy Theories With Ignorant X Post
Ben Ferguson: It's Almost Like the Democratic Party Went to AI and Said...
Nick Shirley Drops a Teaser for Part Two of His Fraud Investigation in...
Fidel Castro’s Grandson Says He’s a Capitalist and That He Would Strike a...
Jamie Dimon: Winning in Iran Matters More Than What Happens to the Market
Chris Cuomo Gets Reality Check From a Former Political Prisoner of the Iranian...
OPINION

Understanding the Revolutions of 2011

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Understanding the Revolutions of 2011
The wave of revolutions sweeping the Middle East bears a striking resemblance to previous political earthquakes. As in Europe in 1848, rising food prices and high unemployment have fueled popular protests from Morocco to Oman. As in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in 1989, frustration with closed, corrupt, and unresponsive political systems has led to defections among elites and the fall of once powerful regimes in Tunisia, Egypt, and perhaps Libya. Yet 1848 and 1989 are not the right analogies for this past winter's events. The revolutions of 1848 sought to overturn traditional monarchies, and those in 1989 were aimed at toppling communist governments. The revolutions of 2011 are fighting something quite different: "sultanistic" dictatorships. Although such regimes often appear unshakable, they are actually highly vulnerable, because the very strategies they use to stay in power make them brittle, not resilient. It is no coincidence that although popular protests have shaken much of the Middle East, the only revolutions to succeed so far -- those in Tunisia and Egypt -- have been against modern sultans. For a revolution to succeed, a number of factors have to come together. The government must appear so irremediably unjust or inept that it is widely viewed as a threat to the country's future; elites (especially in the military) must be alienated from the state and no longer willing to defend it; a broad-based section of the population, spanning ethnic and religious groups and socioeconomic classes, must mobilize; and international powers must either refuse to step in to defend the government or constrain it from using maximum force to defend itself.
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement