You Can't Create a Weirder Candidate to Run Against Than James Talarico
Obama Judge Busted for Having Loud Sex With Police Commander in Her Chambers
Black Judge Suspended for Allegedly Making Racist Comments About White Employee
James Talarico Once Gave an Interesting Invocation Before a Texas Legislative Session
The Media Have Cracked the Case on Who's Paying to Clean Up D.C.
DHS Head Markwayne Mullin Vows Law and Order Will Prevail Against NJ Anti-ICE...
Democrats Are Soft on Crime, but Hard on Law-Abiding Citizens
'We Did Not Vanish.' Greek Media Outlet Slams Christopher Nolan's Diverse 'Odyssey'
Francesca Hong Knows Her Campaign for Governor Is About to Crash and Burn
Zohran Mamdani Doubles Down On His Decision to Skip Israel Day Parade In...
Spencer Pratt Reacts to Gavin Newsom's Late Endorsement of Karen Bass For LA...
'Pizza to Pews' Event Comes to D.C. As Gen-Z Flocks to Catholicism
Trump Currently in Situation Room Ready to Make Major Iran Decision
Trans Student Protected Over 9-Year-Old Girl by Massachusetts School Principal
Trump Fires Back After Jill Biden's Debate Night 'Stroke' Fears
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement