Obama's Top Aide Trotted Out This Gentle Reminder to Dems. They Won't Like...
Ken Paxton Just Roasted James Talarico in New Ad
Trump Blasts Iranian Regime Over 'Foolish Violation of Our Ceasefire Agreement'
Snitch Lines Are Back! Kathy Hochul Tells New Yorkers to Rat Out Masked...
Despite Massive Heat Wave, British Media Pushes Notion Air Conditioning Is 'Selfish'
Mamdani Once Again Promises to Defy SCOTUS to Protect Illegal Aliens
Here's Gavin Newsom's Alarming Plan to Consolidate Power If He's Elected President
Scott Jennings: Republicans Are Winning the Argument Ahead of the Midterms
Why Is Thune Running Scared?
Zohran Mamdani Scores a Major Victory As NYC Greenlights Rent Freezes
Tom Homan Just Demolished Trump's Critics in One Fiery Speech
Spencer Pratt Says One of LA's Largest Homeless NGO's Just Suffered a Major...
Zohran Mamdani Defies the Supreme Court, Vows to Protect Haitians and Syrians
EXCLUSIVE: ICE Made Major Convicted Criminal Arrests Thursday
Pentagon Argues Budget Bill Is Critical for National Defense. Will the Senate Go...
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement