Oyster Shucked: Graham Platner Suspends Campaign Operations in Maine Senate Race
The Platner Revisionism Continues; The LA Times Weeps for Taco Stand Owner ICE...
A Minnesota Somali Politician Had the Audacity to Call for More Childcare Funding
Abdul El-Sayed Was Just Busted Lying About His Views on Defunding the Police
This Massachusetts Town Ended Its Shotspotter Program to 'Protect Migrants,' Now a Man...
Europe Doesn't Believe It Has a Future. That's What Happens When You Stop...
The US Navy Is Now on Patrol in the Middle East
Here's the Truth About AI Data Centers—and Why the Wealthiest County in America...
Defending America's Founding Principles in a Divided Age
Massachusetts Man Indicted for Impersonating Army Veteran for Over 30 Years
USDA Slaps 33 LA Retailers With Violations in Massive SNAP Bust
Ex-Union Boss Pleads Guilty to Swiping $290K Over 12 Years
NJ Grocery Store Owner Gets 27 Months for $2.2 Million SNAP Fraud Scheme
United States Begins More Serious Strikes Against Iran
'Informed American Patriotism': Texas Schools Bring Traditional Civics Back to the Classro...
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement