So, Nancy Mace's Gubernatorial Hopes Might've Been Nuked From Orbit...
Chuck Schumer Really Doesn't Want to Compensate Victims of Government Abuse
Senate Candidates Face Perjury Allegations for Election Rigging Scheme
Doug Burgum Schools CNN on What the Real D.C. Clean Up Scandal Should...
Check Out Who Zohran Mamdani Picked to Be NYC Sheriff
Here's What We Know About the Federal Judge Trying to Stop Renovations of...
Study Shows Massive Support for Self-Defense, Recreational Shooting
Nick Shirley Questions What CA Dems Have to Hide as 'The Stop Nick...
Mamdani to Spend Astounding $5 Million On What Some Describe as the Socialists'...
Spencer Pratt Leads Karen Bass Ahead of LA's Primary Election
Goodbye Pride Month, Hello Nuclear Family Month
She's Back? Janet Mills Hints at Last-Ditch Shake Up in Maine Senate Race
This Wacky Congresswoman Just Demanded an 'Underground Railroad for Abortion'
Inside the Republicans' Fight to Keep Maine’s Senate Seat Red
Iran Claims It Stopped Talking With The United States. Trump Isn't Worried.
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement