You Won't Be Surprised to Find Out How Biden Handled the Southern Poverty...
Todd Blanche Shocks Democrats by Saying This Person Could Benefit From Weaponization Fund
Tom Tiffany Vows to End Evers' 400-Year Tax Increases and Restore Economic Sanity...
AAG Harmeet Dhillon Announces DOJ Investigation Into Washington's Trans Inmate Policy
President Trump Orders Banks to Look at Citizenship Status
Former Congressman Barney Frank Dead at 86
Mamdani Won't Revoke the Luigi Mangione Fangirls' Press Passes
To 'Let Women Live,' End the United Nations
Roy Cooper’s Soft-on-Crime Agenda Let Illegal Alien Child Predator Walk Free
Hakeem Jeffries Calls on Athletes to Sacrifice Their Careers for the Democrats' Political...
Supporters of the Dignity Act Are Playing the Religious Card, and It's Backfiring...
Guess Why the Cambridge City Council Ended Its Shotspotter Program
Remember the Train Derailment in East Palestine? President Trump Does
The Democrats Held a 'No Bad Ideas' Summit. It Went As Poorly As...
FDA's New Guidance Recognizes What Law Enforcement Already Knows
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement