One Year of Trump Winning: VIP SALE, FINAL HOURS!
Law Professor Rips Apart Dems Over Latest Remarks on the Border Patrol Shooting...
The Anti-ICE Signal Chat in Minneapolis Has Reportedly Been Infiltrated...and *That* Name...
Greenland? Hmm..
Conservatism Cannot Survive Without Truth
When We Choose to Fool Ourselves
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 304: Interviewing Museum of the Bible President on...
Reflections on the Anniversary of 'Roe v. Wade'
For Conservatives to Resist Anti-Jewish Ovations on the Far-Right, Committed Christians Ha...
Three School Questions Parents Should Ask Candidates Before the 2026 Midterms
Trump’s Withdrawal From Collapsing Climate Narrative
Conservative Approach to the Homeownership Crisis in America
Can Iran Finally Break From 100 Years of Autocracy?
The Missouri Synagogue Fire and the Virus of ‘Christian’ Antisemitism
How the Live Nation–Ticketmaster Monopoly Has Rigged Concert Ticket Prices
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement