Latest Graham Platner Story Veers Into 'Me Too' Territory
Reports: More CBS News Reporters Could Leave Following Scott Pelley's Termination
Watch These Two Guests on CNN Absolutely Cook Dems Over Their Support for...
Someone Should Check on John Cornyn After His Break With Trump
Graham Platner Hates Corporations, but He Sure Loves Their Money
The Press Support for Pelley Becomes More Strained; MMA at the WH Is...
Mike Pence Hits the Book Tour Trail and Takes Aim at the 'Populist...
AI Will Reshape the Economy—And That’s Exactly the Point
Time to Clean Up California's Election Laws — and Others
SpaceXAI and Gopuff Join Forces to Create AI-Powered Shopping Tool
Pennsylvania Man Pleads Guilty to Defrauding Pandemic Broadband Program of $741,000
Illegal Alien Indicted for Allegedly Stealing Identity to Obtain $44K in Unemployment and...
The Left Defended Kaitlan Collins, but They're Silent on Pelosi Telling a Reporter...
Candace Owens Touts Russia's 'Christian Heritage' — Here's What She Left Out
VA Judge Dismisses Indictments Against Trans-Identifying Sex Offender Who Exposed Himself...
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement