Here's What Led to That SLIGHT Uptick in the Inflation Report. Everyone Simmer...
Is NBC News Serious With This Story? Now, We Know How the Media...
These Gun Rights Groups Slapped a 'Big Beautiful Lawsuit' on the Government That...
Trump's Most Aggressive Immigration Policy Yet Just Dropped
NBC's Weak Defense of Biden's Autopen Scandal Shows How Desperate Democrats Have Become
Trump Targets UN Over Anti-Israel Bias—Commission Resigns in Wake
Rhode Island Democrat Smears ICE As ‘Nazi Gestapo Thugs’ for Arresting Illegal Alien
Trump Issues Ultimatum, Russia Yawns, EU Whines — Trump Fires Back
Cuomo Under Fire: Rivals Pile on As Former Governor Re-Enters the Race
Republicans Will Need a Lot More Ads Like This As the Midterms Approach
Epstein’s Former Cell Mate Shares His Thoughts on the ‘Suicide’ Narrative
Apple Announces $500 Million Investment Into US-Produced Magnets
America’s Largest Teachers Union Lost It Over SCOTUS Ruling to Dismantle the Department...
House Bill Memorializes Jocelyn Nungaray
Does Zohran Mamdani Agree With His Father on Suicide Bombings?
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement