Alicia Keys Doesn't Want Women to Have Equal Rights
Despite New Allegations, Cenk Uygur Continues to Defend Graham Platner
The Hill Clutches Pearls About Vice President Vance's Book Royalties
Here's the Despicable Reason Why MS NOW Says Platner's Latest Accuser Is More...
Meet the Man Preserving the Stories of World War II Veterans
Here's the Most Deranged Reaction to the FIFA Red Card Retraction
The Wisconsin Congressional Staffer Who Called for 'Trans Jihad' Got Fired, Doubled Down...
Trump Tells the International Criminal Court to Go Pound Sand
Francesca Hong Would Put the Palestinian Cause Ahead of Wisconsin Voters
An Ex-KKK Grand Wizard Just Praised One of NYC's Newly Elected Democratic Socialists
Abandoning Milton Friedman Is a Gift to the Socialist Left
This Democrat Senator Was Cheering For Mexico in the World Cup
The View's Sunny Hostin Claims American Flags Make Her Feel 'Unsafe'
Platner Loses Major Endorsements After Sexual Assault Allegation
The Media Hates That Trump Saved U.S. Soccer
OPINION

House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
House Republicans’ Sequestration Shenanigans

The continuing resolution (CR) drafted by the House Appropriations Committee and supported by the GOP leadership would provide discretionary funding of $988 billion (on an annualized basis) for fiscal 2014. That figure essentially matches funding for fiscal 2013, which included sequestration cuts. Under sequestration, however, funding for fiscal 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion.

Advertisement

So why wouldn’t House Republicans simply draft a continuing resolution at the lower $967 billion figure? The answer appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.  

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.  

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it! There’s also a disingenuous chart with a propagandistic warning:

Advertisement

Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them “dangerous” to our national security.

Unless I’m missing something (and I’ll be happy to issue a public mea culpa if I am), this is about as pathetic as it gets when it comes to congressional budget politics.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement