Trump Basically Says Starting Tonight, Hell Will Rain Down on Iran
With Extreme Poverty at All-Time Lows, Democratic Socialists Hope to Reverse the Trend
After Ousting Graham Platner in Maine, Bernie Sanders Says President Trump Doesn't Believe...
Representation Matters in Movies, Right Up Until It Doesn't
Did Jon Ossoff Really Say This About Liberty and Supporting ICE?
CNBC Lists the Ten 'Worst' States to Live In. See If You Can...
The New York Times Explainer for Its Catch-and-Kill Report to Benefit Graham Platner
Congress' Most Prolific Stock Traders Are Holding a Ritzy Fundraiser for Democrat Elaine...
To Democrats, the Economy Is Just One Massive Jobs Program
These Three Arizona Democrats Are Backed by the Soros Family
Iranian Drones in Cuba? Here's What Trump Knows.
Rents Hit All-Time High in Mamdani's NYC As Millionaires Make Mass Exodus
Iran Launches Strikes Against Maritime Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz
Twelve Democrat States Block Paramount Merge with Warner Bros
A Grand Prix Race Heads to DC – But It Wasn't An Easy...
OPINION

How Environmentalists Keep Heating Bills High

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
How Environmentalists Keep Heating Bills High

This has been a colder-than-usual winter in the Midwest and Northeast, so many Americans are facing high home heating and electric bills. In some areas, these bills can reach $1,000 a month.

Advertisement

Liberals, of course, charge that Donald Trump is the culprit. An AP story last week screamed: "Trump Once Again Wants to Cut Energy Assistance to the Poor." Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders charged that if Trump has his way and eliminates the Low Income Heating Assistance Program, people might "freeze to death."

But wait. Donald Trump is pro-American energy development. He isn't the one who is making energy bills more expensive in the Northeast and the mountain states. It's the liberal green groups and politicians such as Bernie Sanders, who accede to their anti-fossil fuel demands.

In my book Fueling Freedom, my co-author Kathleen Hartnett White and I discovered that the shale gas revolution lowered the price of natural gas by about two-thirds (from $10 to $3 per million cubic feet). This, in turn, has meant big savings in electricity and home heating costs from where they were a decade ago. We calculated the benefits to poor households from these lower prices and estimated that shale gas results in $10 billion in consumer savings each year. The annual budget for the LIHEAP program is about $3 billion. So shale gas is saving poor families three times what LIHEAP does.

Yet the left-wing politicians who say how shameful it is to cut energy assistance are the ones who want America to stop producing shale gas by banning fracking and other modern drilling technologies that make natural gas so cheap.

Advertisement

Cheap natural gas from fracking also benefits millions more poor families than does LIHEAP. The government estimates that about 6 million poor families receive LIHEAP each year. But there are at least 10 million low-income families in America. Cheap natural gas lowers costs for all families, while federal assistance only benefits the ones who sign up for government handouts.

If the goal is to provide cheap energy for low-income Americans, fracking is many times more effective than LIHEAP.

The story doesn't end there. Home heating and electric bills would be much cheaper still for poor families without the so-called renewable-energy standards pushed by greens and liberal politicians at the state and local levels. The Manhattan Institute has found that states with these wind and solar mandates have had much larger hikes in utility costs than states without them. New York, which is revving up its green energy policies, charges its residents 40 percent more for electric power than the national average.

I'm still not done. Professor Bernard Weinstein of Southern Methodist University has examined why utility prices have spiked so much in the Northeast: "New England and New York are using imported liquefied natural gas (LNG), which is much more expensive than domestic gas, to satisfy nearly 20 percent of their heating and electric power needs," Weinstein found. "Some of this imported gas has come from Russia, despite current international sanctions."

Advertisement

Imported natural gas? How can a nation with massive deposits of very cheap natural gas -- such as the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and West Virginia -- be importing natural gas?

One reason is that we don't have pipelines to inexpensively transport the natural gas to the Northeast. Environmentalists who hate oil and gas have spent years blocking this vital infrastructure -- not just the Keystone Pipeline but also many other pipelines that should be transporting shale oil and gas efficiently across the country. It doesn't seem to bother the green groups that the biggest victims of anti-fossil fuel policies are low- and middle-income Americans. Never has.

Environmentalism is effectively a regressive tax on America's poorest households, imposed upon them by liberal politicians and the rich liberals who fund them, such as Democratic donor-extraordinaire Tom Steyer.

Amazing, isn't it, that this same crowd turns around and attacks Trump for forcing poor people to pay more for energy. If you have sticker shock when you pay your energy bill this month, at least you now know whom to thank -- and it ain't Donald Trump.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement