'Iron Lung' and the Future of Filmmaking
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Just Days After Mass Layoffs, WaPo Returns to Lying About the Trump Admin
Nigerian Man Sentenced to Over 8 Years for International Inheritance Fraud Targeting Elder...
Florida's Crackdown on Non-English Speaking Drivers Is Hilarious
Family Fraud: Father, Two Daughters Convicted in $500k USDA Nutrition Program Scam
American Olympians Bash Their Own Country As Democrats and Media Gush
Speculation Into Iran Strike Continues As Warplanes Are Pulled From Super Bowl Flyover...
OPINION

Marks of the beast

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

“All Americans Agree Our Politicians Suck.”

That’s how FDL’s Jon Walker summarized-by-headline a comprehensive survey of American opinion, the newly released fifth political typology study conducted by the Pew Research Center, entitled “Beyond Red & Blue.”

Advertisement

“There are few points on which all the typology groups can agree,” Pew reports, “but cynicism about politicians is one. Majorities across all eight groups, as well as Bystanders, say elected officials lose touch with the people pretty quickly.”

The numbers are startling. Fully 72 percent of us agree that those we send to Washington to represent us promptly lose touch with us. Sixty percent “strongly agree.”

Asked to agree or disagree with the statement, “Most elected officials don’t care what people like me think,” 69 percent of Americans agreed — 60 percent strongly so.

You’d almost think we need labels on politicians to alert folks to the danger: “Warning: Highly Paid Politician Spending Your Money” or “Beware: Usual Politician Who Says One Thing and Does Another.”

But seriously, even in a robust state for voter initiatives like California, no crazy citizen has ever proposed such a humiliating, obviously unconstitutional and historically repugnant idea as making politicians go around in public wearing warning labels on their chest. It’d be downright un-American.

Instead, that’s what California State Senators Mark DeSaulnier (D-Concord) and Loni Hancock (D-Berkeley) intend to force on citizens. Under their landmark Senate Bill 448, in section (c), “The individual circulating an initiative, referendum, or recall petition shall wear the badge required by subdivisions (a) and (b) on his or her chest in clear view of all individuals signing or asked to sign the petition.”

Advertisement

Section (a) of the bill requires one’s new personal license plate to read, either “PAID SIGNATURE GATHERER” or “VOLUNTEER SIGNATURE GATHERER.” Though our nation’s High Court has ruled unanimously that citizens have a “core” right to hire people to circulate their petitions, legislators insolently hinder this right and belittle those exercising it.

Even though being a registered voter is not required of those who circulate petitions, SB-448’s section (b) mandates that the chest-badge also contain either the California county in which one is registered to vote or display, “NOT REGISTERED TO VOTE.”

This proposed new law, no doubt deliberated over at length by these senators, would compel a husband or wife receiving a petition in the mail to fashion a badge and to wear it before engaging in any political conversation with one another. Or heaven forbid, talk to a parent. Or sibling. Or friend or neighbor or co-worker.

Citizens should not have to wear large badges on their chests when speaking to their neighbors or friends or relatives or, heck, even total strangers about politics. Or, for that matter, any subject two or more free people voluntarily choose to discuss.

Just to be clear the “badge” is to be nearly as large as a placard, Section (d) states, “The print on the badge shall be no smaller than 30-point font.”

I thought California Democrats were “live and let live” folks. Apparently that doesn’t extend to petitioning one’s government.

Advertisement

At least, not if the petition could have the impact of reforming government in ways our reviled politicians don’t favor or to refer a law our rulers have passed to a vote of the people or to recall one of our exalted solons. While SB-448 harasses initiative petition circulators, none of the rules apply to the same petition circulator when working to gather signatures for Senator DeSaulnier or Hancock.

Oversight? Don’t hold your breath waiting for a friendly amendment.

Government has no rightful power to force citizens to display signs on their chests saying what the government prescribes — no matter the message. This is even more clear regarding those engaged in petitioning their government, something the U.S. Supreme Court places at the “zenith” of the First Amendment.

The sponsors of this ludicrous legislation so despise the initiative process and bristle at the thought of the voters actually being their boss that they have lost their senses.

Is it any wonder why politicians aren’t better liked?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement