House GOP Looking to Ban TikTok Across Federal Government
Pro-Choice Protestors Disrupt Capitol Hill, But Enjoyed a Free Dinner First
Lawmakers Are Paving the Way for a Potential 2024 DeSantis Run
Colorado Pursues Red Flag Laws Threatening the Second Amendment
Trump or Biden? Poll Suggests Americans Want Neither
Trump Responds to Musk's Hunter Biden 'Twitter Files' As Liberals Melt Down
Now More Than Ever, We Shouldn't Rely on Red Chinese Chipmakers
Time for Tough Questions About Ukraine
The Great Meltdown Is Just Beginning
NBC Is An Appendage Of The DNC (I’ll Let You Decide Which One)
Kanye and Conservatives’ Two Big Problems
Rogue Virginia ABC Sends Police to Enforce COVID Lockdown
An Election Day Travesty in Arizona
A Quick Bible Study, Vol. 142: Noah, the Flood, and Jesus
Sen. Rand Paul Calls Out Fauci For Saying He Has No Regrets During...

Students Share Penn State Shame

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
The initial shock of the child abuse scandal at Penn State was disturbing enough, but what came later may have been even more so.

That Joe Paterno, other coaches and members of the administration failed in a straightforward, utterly uncomplicated moral task -- to protect defenseless children from rape -- is almost mind numbing. No weighing of competing interests or complex variables was required. On one hand, you had children being abused and, on the other, the reputation of a hugely profitable football program. They chose the football program!

In a condign coda, they've done far more damage to the program's reputation by choosing the immoral path than they would have by doing the right thing. If the alleged predator, Jerry Sandusky, had been arrested for child abuse in 2002 (or at any point in the previous decade as reports filtered up of his criminal conduct), it would have been a one-day story. Instead, the beloved Joe Paterno has been fired. The president of the university is out, and Penn State stands revealed (and reviled) as a corrupt institution.

When people violate our standards of decency, our desire for justice demands a certain social sanction. A crime or sin is a tear in the social fabric, and our collective disapproval and censure is the way we begin to repair it. When that process breaks down, it makes us feel insecure and makes the transgression all the more threatening.

So it was almost as dismaying to see the response of a mob of Penn State students reacting to the ouster of Paterno, as it was to hear about the child abuse itself. When word of the firings first reached campus, thousands of students surged from their dorms and rampaged down the streets of State College, Pa., blowing air horns and other noisemakers in the middle of the night.

They chanted Paterno's name, threw rocks and fireworks at police, knocked down two light poles, and overturned and crushed a local TV news truck. According to The New York Times, the mob also tore down street signs, smashed car windows, and tipped over trashcans and newspaper vending boxes. Call it Occupy State College. The only missing piece was public defecation.

What they intended to convey by this mayhem is less clear. A freshman told the Times that students blamed the media for Paterno's fall. Ah, so that's it. Well, then, the only obvious answer is to smash car windows and destroy a news truck.

A handful of the braying barbarians was arrested. But the rest returned to their dorms -- presumably to finish their homework for courses in "racial categories" and "postmodern lesbianism." They probably won't reflect on the irony of a university -- the kind of place where a stray word can get you cashiered for sexual harassment -- being responsible for the grossest criminal negligence regarding children.

The students were angry and upset, and they've been taught to believe that their feelings, whatever they are, deserve to be expressed. Well, they don't -- at least not in that way. As even the tolerant New York Times noted in its coverage, "Some students noted the irony of their coming out to oppose what they saw as a disgraceful end to Mr. Paterno's distinguished career and then adding to the ignobility of the episode by starting an unruly protest."

Here's a suggestion: What the students ought to have felt -- and perhaps did feel, though they hardly have names for this antique sensation anymore -- was shame. Though personally innocent, until the riot, they should have felt ashamed to be associated with an institution that allegedly enabled a serial child rapist to prey upon victims.

Their proper mood ought to have been one of sadness and a desire to make restitution. Anger, too, should have played a part. Not anger at the board of trustees for firing responsible officials, rather anger at the university's administration for permitting a profound outrage. That's the way a community with basic moral understanding behaves.

A couple of days after the riot, a larger crowd of students did hold a candlelight vigil for the victims, which was encouraging. The mood at the vigil was described as "solemn" with subdued applause for several speakers. But the students seemed unable to sustain a serious mien for very long, and, by the end, the vigil was transformed into a rally with the crowd bellowing, "We are Penn State!"

One student participant said of Paterno's firing that "having that taken away from us made us feel lost." No, they were lost long before that.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video