We Have the Long-Awaited News About Who Will Control the Minnesota State House
60 Minutes Reporter Who Told Trump Hunter's Laptop Can't Be Verified Afraid Her...
Wait, Is Joe Biden Even Up to Sign the New Government Spending Bill?
Van Jones Has Been on a One-Man War Against the Dems
Van Jones Clears the Air About Donald Trump With a Former CNN Editor,...
NYC Mayor Eric Adams Explains Why He Confronted Suspected UnitedHealthcare Shooter to His...
The Absurd—and Cruel—Myth of a ‘Government Shutdown’
When in Charge, Be in Charge
If You Try to Please Everybody, You’ll End Up Pleasing Nobody
University of Arizona ‘Art’ Exhibit Demands Destruction of Israel
Biden-Harris Steered Us Toward Economic Doom; Trump Will Fix It
Trump Hits Biden With Amicus Brief Over the 'Fire Sale' of Border Wall
JK Rowling Marked the Anniversary of When She First Spoke Out Against Transgender...
Argentina’s Milei Seems to Have Cracked the Code on How to Cut Government...
The Founding Fathers Were Geniuses
OPINION

Turnout in Georgia Special Election Greatly Exceeded Historical Norms

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Brynn Anderson

During the next few weeks, conservative pundits and analysts will pore over the results of Tuesday’s runoff election in Georgia. Much will be written about why Republican U.S. Senate candidates David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler were defeated by their Democratic opponents Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock. Some have already noted that turnout in some regions carried by Donald Trump during the 2020 Presidential election lagged behind the rest of the state. There is some truth to this. However, it should also be noted, that turnout in both Republican and Democratic districts alike was very high and significantly exceeded historical norms. 

Advertisement

Seasoned observers of politics know that turnout in both special elections and runoff elections is usually less than turnout in general elections. This is even the case when the special election receives national attention. The number of votes cast in the 2017 special U.S. Senate election in Alabama where Democrat Doug Jones defeated Republican Roy Moore was about 64 percent of the total cast in the 2016 U.S Senate Election that took place in Alabama. Similarly, in 2010, turnout in the special U.S. Senate election in Massachusetts when Republican Scott Brown defeated Democrat Martha Coakley was approximately 75 percent of the turnout in 2008 U.S. Senate election that took place in the Bay State. 

An even better example comes from Georgia. Georgia is the only state that mandates runoffs for U.S. Senate seats when no candidate receives a majority of votes in the general election. One fairly recent U.S. Senate runoff election in the Peach State took place in 1992. That year, incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Wyche Fowler won a plurality, but not a majority, of votes in the general election. The runoff election, which took place later that November, pitted Fowler against Republican Paul Coverdell, a former Georgia State Senator and Director of the Peace Corps under President George H.W. Bush. 

Republicans invested heavily in this election. Even though Democrats had already won enough Senate seats to give them majority control of the U.S. Senate, a Coverdell victory would give moderate and conservative Democrats greater leverage in their negotiations with President Clinton. That said, there were some obstacles to organizing a center-right coalition to support Paul Coverdell. Some social conservatives had misgivings about supporting Coverdell since he supported legal abortion. Additionally, the Libertarian Party’s U.S. Senate nominee received about 3 percent of the vote in the general election – a significant percentage for a 3rd party candidate. 

Advertisement

However, Coverdell’s assurances that he would oppose both taxpayer funding for abortion and gays in the military won him the support of many social conservatives. Additionally, Coverdell’s campaign was assisted by an endorsement from Jim Hudson, the Libertarian Party’s U.S. Senate nominee. In the end, a center-right coalition prevailed and Coverdell narrowly won the runoff by 50.65% to 49.35% margin. This made Coverdell the second Republican to represent Georgia in the U.S. Senate since Reconstruction. Coverdell went on to represent Georgia in the U.S. Senate until he passed away from a brain hemorrhage in 2000.

Despite the substantial investment that many outside groups made in the 1992 Georgia runoff election, turnout was still considerably less than the turnout for the 1992 general election. Even though Paul Coverdell prevailed, his special election vote total was only 59 percent of his general election vote total. In contrast, the vote total for David Perdue in Tuesday’s runoff election was almost 90 percent of his general election total. Similarly, the vote total for Kelly Loeffler on Tuesday was about 90 percent of the total received by Republican candidates who ran for that Senate seat in November.

An important point to remember is that the turnout efforts organized by Republicans, conservatives, and pro-lifers in Georgia were successful. In fact, multiple conservative groups mobilized hundreds of volunteers to go to Georgia and assist with get-out-the-vote efforts. Students for Life of America (SFLA) reports that they knocked on over 70,000 doors for one-on-one conversations with voters and reached hundreds of thousands of other voters through text messages and phone calls. Similarly, Susan B. Anthony List’s Partner Women Speak Out PAC stated that they had made 800,000 in-person visits to Georgia voters. (Disclaimer: I am an Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, the research and education arm of the Susan B. Anthony List). 

Advertisement

Overall, the conservative groups that assisted with the Senate campaigns of David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler should be commended for their efforts. On Tuesday, the turnout for both Republican U.S. Senate candidates was very high and significantly exceeded historical norms. Unfortunately, Democrats and liberal groups were also very successful in turning out their voters for Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock.

Michael J. New is a Visiting Assistant Professor at the Busch School of Business at The Catholic University of America and an Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Follow him on Twitter @Michael_J_New

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos