That Time MSNBC Ripped an NHL Player for Not Accepting an Obama White...
Teens Say AI Is Now Part Of Everyday Life–Many Parents Have No Idea
Joy Behar Thinks the SAVE Act Will Help Republicans Cheat in November
The Left Wants a Nuclear Family Meltdown
Tim Walz's Paid Medical and Family Leave Law Is Already Being Abused
Grand Rapids Mayor: People Should Be Made to Feel Shame for Having Guns
Dear, Gavin Newsom: Stop Using Dyslexia As a Shield
The Legendary Ending to President Trump's State of the Union
President Trump Just Responded to Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib's Outbursts at the...
JD Vance Reveals What He Saw From Democrats During the State of the...
Mamdani's NYC Flirts With Chaos
Moreno Unveils Bill to Fine Welfare Recipients $100K for Sending Money Overseas
Feds Freeze $259M in Medicaid Funds to Minnesota Over Alleged Fraud
Florida Man Sentenced to 6 Years in Nationwide Bank Fraud Scheme
Memphis Woman Sentenced to Federal Prison for $560K COVID-19 Fraud Across 20 States
OPINION

How The Contraception Mandate May Spread Measles: Politicizing Preventive Care Increases Public Distrust

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
How The Contraception Mandate May Spread Measles: Politicizing Preventive Care Increases Public Distrust

A recent measles outbreak starting at Disneyland has public health authorities seeing spots.

They are confounded by a sizable number of people, including some celebrities, who oppose vaccinations. According to On Immunity author Eula Biss, anti-vaccine sentiment is often not medical but “political” and rooted in “fear.”

Advertisement

One of the best ways to cause distrust in public health experts is for the government to politicize science. This can be seen in contentious areas like climate change, embryo research, and the beginning of human life. Experts there have infused ideology into data and have even changed or redefined words to fit their agendas. Global warming has become “climate change,” embryos “pre-embryos,” and “conception” redefined to mean implantation.Obamacare claims to have standardized vaccine access. But it may be feeding anti-vaccine sentiment in a fairly direct way. 

In their rules that govern vaccines and immunizations, Obamacare bureaucrats decided to import the most intense of political debates surrounding abortion and women’s rights. Obamacare lists a category of health care called “preventive services.” These are supposed to be services that prevent diseases or identify them, especially immunizations. Obamacare prioritizes these services so that preventive services must be completely free, whereas many sick patients must cover co-pays for the drugs they need.

In 2011, Obamacare bureaucrats decided that there’s another disease they want to put into the category with measles and polio as requiring preventive care: pregnancy. 

The Obama administration defined contraception and sterilization as a preventive service – the same status held by vaccines that prevent highly infectious diseases. The Affordable Care Act itself doesn’t require this definition, and Congress had failed almost two dozen times to pass a bill giving all women free contraception. 

Advertisement

Related:

HEALTH

Obamacare bureaucrats simply decided to provide women free contraception by flexing their medical expertise. They mandated, as a matter of preventive care and immunization, that health plans must handle drugs that prevent babies the same way they handle drugs that prevent chickenpox. 

The government’s committee used experts almost exclusively associated with Planned Parenthood, which is the nation’s largest abortion provider and sells contraception to hundreds of thousands of women. No pro-fertility experts were invited.

The committee’s bias was so extreme that one panel member dissented. Dr. Anthony Lo Sasso of the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health said the majority report was based on “subjective determinations filtered through a lens of advocacy.”

Obamacare’s defenders then doubled down on their view that fetuses and pertussis are equivalent. Religious people who didn’t want to provide contraception or early abortion pills were told they should lose their lawsuits because their objection was supposedly no different than objecting to vaccines for actual diseases. 

The New Yorker’s Steve Coll compared Hobby Lobby to a hypothetical Taliban company that objects to the polio vaccine.Senator Barbara Boxer, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, NARAL Pro-Choice America

, and others likewise echoed the idea that contraception and vaccines are equivalent. 

Advertisement

Pregnancy is not a disease. It is a healthy condition that impacts people’s deepest beliefs. Obamacare used it to politicize the category of preventive care and immunization, threatening to punish dissenters with fines from the IRS. 

When public health experts equated pregnancy with immunizable disease, they politicized preventive care. No one should be surprised when citizens view those same experts’ recommendations on vaccines through an ideological and fearful lens. Public health experts have watered down the scientific discourse surrounding preventive care. 

Scientific progressivists try to conform citizens to what bureaucrats think is best for them, even categorizing human procreation as a disease. Sowing the wind of politicized science, they have reaped a whirlwind of public distrust.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement