Why the NYT Had to Issue a Monster Correction for This Piece About...
Why This Huffington Post Reporter's Good Friday Tweet Was Quite Embarrassing
The Iran Ceasefire Talks Have Imploded
Did You See That March Jobs Report?
Trump Reportedly Will Issue New Order That Will Pay Civilian Staffers for ICE/Border...
Ex-Biden Staffer Charged With Murder. Here's What Happened.
Chuck Schumer Is In Worse Trouble With His Party Than We Thought
Here's What I Want From the Next Attorney General
Colorado Springs Man Sentenced for Hate Crime Hoax That Probably Flipped the City's...
Plainclothes Miracle
Check Out This Kid's Hilarious Response to CNN When He's Asked Why He's...
America at 250: Rediscovering Exceptionalism in Rail and Space
Nine-Year Bid-Rigging Plot Inflated US Air Force Contracts by $37 Million
Barabbas or Bust
Prayer to Remove the Veil of Evil Darkness Over Iran
OPINION

Will a Weak Economy Derail the Bull Market?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Will a Weak Economy Derail the Bull Market?

“The stock market and the economy are two different things.”
– Milton Friedman

The Nasdaq last week finally hit an all-time high, surpassing the 5,000 level achieved 15 years ago in March 2000. It took much longer for the Nasdaq to hit record highs than the Dow or the S&P 500 due to the dot-com frenzy in 2000 that sent the technology-heavy Nasdaq soaring.

The Nasdaq record set off another round of predictions by the doomsayers of another “imminent crash.” In the past few months, we’ve seen dire forecasts, including one from Congressman Ron Paul. Many of the warnings are aimed at seniors who are vulnerable to irresponsible scare tactics.

In addition, the Nasdaq has nearly quadrupled in six years – at a time when the Cassandras were warning of another collapse. How wrong they were!

There’s a big difference between the Nasdaq of 2000 and today. Back then, the high-tech stock index was selling at 175 times earnings. Today, it is selling for 30 times earnings.

Are stocks too expensive? They are certainly fully priced, and today’s market is vulnerable. We haven’t had a serious correction in years.

Yesterday, the first-quarter real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate came in at an anemic 0.2%, confirming my view that the economy has slowed to a crawl.

Last week, the quarterly Gross Output (GO) and B2B (business-to-business spending) data that I have been championing were released by the federal government. Real GO, which measures spending at all stages of production, rose only 2.6% on an annualized basis, and B2B climbed only 2.5%, much slower than past quarters.

It is not enough to cause a recession, but it’s enough to worry Fed Chair Janet Yellen and her colleagues at the U.S. central bank to extend its easy-money policies. In short, the Fed won’t raise rates any time soon and, in fact, will engage in printing more money.

Last weekend, I talked to Robert Kuttner, former chief economist at BusinessWeek, who told me that the Fed’s low interest rate policy has been good for the economy on net balance. He will be the defending attorney when we put “The Fed on Trial” at FreedomFest on July 10 (see our newly designed website: www.FreedomFest.com).

Certainly, low rates have been good for the stock market and our portfolio. And I think that trend will continue, especially for dividend-paying stocks in Forecasts & Strategies. It is the golden age of income investment.

Remember, the stock market is always looking forward. With a weak economy, the Fed is unlikely to raise rates any time soon and will continue to pump new money into the system. Much of that new money is likely to go into the stock market.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement