Ghanaian 'Prophet' Cons Followers Into Building Arks After Predicting Another Great Flood
Former Voice of America Reporter Accused of Assassination Plot Against Exiled Iranian Lead...
Trump’s DHS Pays Illegal Immigrants to Leave — Critics Ignore the Cost of...
BREAKING: President Trump Announces Christmas Day Airstrikes on ISIS in Nigeria
Adam Kinzinger Took Revenge on CBS Over 60 Minutes Drama. There's Just One...
Leftist College Professor Declares This Classic Christmas Movie 'Bigoted'
Michelle Wu Rewrites Boston’s History to Virtue-Signal at Trump
Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste: Aussie Pols Ram Through Bondi Beach-Inspired...
The White House Rejected Catholic Bishops' Immigration Christmas Wish
Nicki Minaj Faces Massive Backlash After Pro-Trump, Pro-Christian Speech at AmericaFest
17,500 Illegal Immigrants Arrested Under the Laken Riley Act
This Democrat is Trying to Rip Trump's Name From an Iconic Building
Justice Department Challenges Illinois Laws It Says Endanger Federal Agents
These Cringey Trans Terrorists Just Got Handed Federal Charges
Former USDA Worker Owes $36M in Restitution for Selling SNAP Data to Criminals
OPINION

'Progressivism': The Modern Zeitgeist

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

To fully understand current events, it is critical to comprehend that every human is a product of their times, their present culture, their “zeitgeist”—the term I will use in this column.  The word “zeitgeist” means “the spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the generally accepted ideas and beliefs of the time.”  In every period of history, a certain model of thinking dominates the age, and everyone, to a greater or lesser degree, is influenced by it.   It's impossible to totally separate ourselves from our “zeitgeist” because we are surrounded by it every day, we grow up learning it and absorbing it, it is the inescapable environment universally acknowledged and rarely questioned—even if it’s wrong. Here are a couple of examples of historical “zeitgeist” to illustrate what I mean.

Advertisement

Christopher Columbus and his “age” was certainly different from ours.  We don’t approve of many things they did (they wouldn’t approve of much of what we do, either), and the Left is especially vociferous in their condemnation of Columbus and the early European explorers.  But their “zeitgeist” was completely different from ours.  They saw no dichotomy between converting the heathen and looting them of their gold.  Such a dichotomy is abhorrent to us, but we didn’t grow up in their “zeitgeist.”   Reading modern viewpoints and opinions back into history is not an acceptable way to judge and interpret previous generations.

Certainly, the people of Columbus’s age “sinned” and knew they were doing so, just as we do (or should).  But to understand them, we must understand their “zeitgeist.”  The Aztecs whom the Spaniards conquered were hardly exemplary.  We should learn from, but not blanketly condemn them when their culture, education, and surroundings were totally unlike ours.  Failing to even attempt to comprehend previous people’s thoughts is most unjust. The Left are masters at it.

Another example. I quote:  "I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races...I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races from living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race."

Advertisement

Related:

PROGRESSIVISM

Those words were spoken by Abraham Lincoln in 1858.  While obviously repulsive to Americans today, it was the “zeitgeist” of Lincoln’s time.  Indeed, Harvard University had done a study of human skull sizes and discovered that the average skull size of a black person was smaller than that of a white person’s.  And, in Lincoln’s day (and even into the early 20th century), it was accepted that the bigger your brain, the smarter you were.  Whites are superior to blacks because they have larger brains!  “Science” proves it!  Now today, we know that brain size has nothing to do with intelligence, but that was the “science” of Lincoln’s day, and he would have been “unscientific” to reject it.  How can we condemn him if we truly understand the “zeitgeist” of his age?  We can’t, and we shouldn’t.  What we should do is try to understand and learn from it.

Rising above our “zeitgeist” is a most challenging accomplishment, and not even historians can do it perfectly.  If we had lived in Columbus’s Spain (or Italy) in 1492, or Lincoln’s Illinois (a Northern state, mind you) in 1858, we would surely have believed the exact same things they did.  Some people are occasionally able to “think outside the box” and see truth from an eternal, fixed perspective, but that is a very rare commodity among humans.   By and large, we accept the “zeitgeist” of our age.

Advertisement

“Zeitgeist” arises out of history, of course.  It’s a process, not an event, and usually takes time to develop.  Columbus and Cortez did not invent the dichotomy they lived in regarding converting the heathen and stealing their gold.  If you think Lincoln’s words were bad, read his debate opponent, Stephen Douglas’s (a Democrat), sometime.  We haven’t arrived at our present “zeitgeist” in America overnight, either.  Currently, most Americans’ thinking has become dominated by “progressive” ideology, and interestingly, a hypocrisy inherent in that thinking is to condemn anyone who lived before who might foil their political agenda—Columbus, America’s Founding Fathers, though rarely Lincoln, for rather obvious reasons. 

Naturally, different cultures had/have different “zeitgeists”.  Human or child sacrifice was an acceptable “zeitgeist” among the Aztecs and many other ancient “civilizations,” as was slavery, polygamy, war, and a few other currently frowned-upon customs.  Our Leftist-driven “zeitgeist” has “progressed” from those practices to abortion on demand (no sense in waiting for the child to be born to sacrifice it), transgenderism, child mutilation, and, in China—the Left’s great model—mass murder, forced organ harvesting, and re-education camps.  Human inequality and racism are “zeitgeists” of nearly every culture in history and are evident today in the Left’s DEI program. Columbus’s (and Lincoln’s) “zeitgeist” accepted Jesus as God and Savior, and a world created by God, something our modern Leftist “zeitgeist” rejects in favor of Darwinian-based atheistic naturalism. Modern communication has shrunk the world, thus, much of Leftism is virtually universal now.  Middle Eastern Muslims reject most of it, but they are barbarians, right?

Advertisement

Rising above our “zeitgeist” to see eternal truths is extremely challenging.  Nobody does it perfectly.  After all, doesn’t everybody have their own “truth” nowadays, as a recent modern “progressive” DEI-hire informed us?

But, how did this modern “zeitgeist” arise?   Historical survey coming in future articles.

Check my substack mklewis929.substack.com.   There’s lots of other good stuff on Leftism, the Founders, etc., along with Biblical studies, so sign up.  Follow me on Twitter:  @thailandmkl.   Read my western novels, Whitewater , River Bend,  Return to River Bend, and Allie’s Dilemma all available on Amazon.  

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement