The Debt Ceiling 'Deal' and DeSantis' Fundraising Strategy
Will the FBI Meet Today's Deadline to Turn Over the Biden Bribery Document?
Biden's Debt Deal on the Brink as More Republicans Vow to Vote No
CUNY School of Law Commencement Speaker Delivered a Speech That Was Off-the-Wall...
Heritage Foundation: Here Are the Real Losers in the Debt Ceiling Agreement
Crazed Machete-Wielding Professor Slapped With Charges After Threatening to Chop Up Report...
This Has to Be the Most Brutal Way to Lose a Championship Baseball...
Latest DC Robbery Suspect Shows How Crime Is Out of Control
Chicago's 'Peacekeeper' Plan to Address Crime Went As Well As You Expected
Despite Bud Light's Efforts, Sales Continue Downward Spiral
The Democratic Party’s War on Parents Continues
Russia Issues Arrest Warrant for GOP Senator
Why There Are Now Calls to Boycott Lululemon...and It Has Nothing to Do...
Trans Predator Who ‘Identifies as a Teenager’ Reportedly Pleads Guilty to Enticement of...
McCarthy: We Won the Debt Ceiling Fight, and Democrats Got Nothing

Do Liberals Oppose Affordable Housing?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

I’m a little behind on my reading, so you’ll have to forgive that the paper I’m about to talk about has been out for over a year.  We tend to associate the push for more affordable housing, whether it is direct subsidies like the Section 8 Voucher program or lending requirements like the Community Reinvestment Act, with those more of the liberal persuasion. 

An empirical analysis, published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Urban Economics, by UCLA economist Matthew Kahn (believe me, no conservative or libertarian is he), finds that:

across California metropolitan areas from 2000 to 2008…liberal cities grant fewer new housing permits than observationally similar cities located within the same metropolitan area. Cities experiencing a growth in their liberal voter share have a lower new housing permit growth rate.

Yes the analysis controls for income, so this isn’t just a NIMBY effect, but does seem to be the result of either ideology or political preferences.  So it appears that while liberals push for more federal housing subsidies, they fight against more housing, and hence less affordable housing, at the local level.  Now you might suspect that the hope is that one off-sets the other. 

I wouldn’t be surprised to believe the citizens of, say, San Francisco want the rest of us to subsidize their lifestyle and also believe more federal subsidies can take care of affordable housing needs.  But the unfortunate truth is that the two, increased federal subsidies and local supply restrictions, end up driving up housing prices, contributing to housing bubbles and ultimately do little to provide affordable housing.  The reason is that increased demand, which is what most federal housing subsidies do, simply drives up price in the presence of inelastic supply. 

If liberals truly cared about the poor and needy, they’d deregulate their local housing market and actually allow for the provision of affordable housing.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video