SCHUMER SHUTDOWN SALE: 60% Off VIP Memberships!
So, That's the Story Behind How a Secret Service Agent on Jill Biden's...
Watch What Happens When a White Soy Boy Lib Harassed Black ICE Agents...
What Happened to Megyn Kelly?
The Houthis Have Entered the Iran War – Here's What That Could Mean
Thieves With Sweet Tooth Steal 12 Tons of KitKat Bars in Truck Robbery
Iran Threatens to Strike American Universities in the Middle East if This Demand...
This Is Why I'm Watching HBO's New 'Harry Potter' Series
The Madness of Palm Sunday
Fetterman Claps Back at Critics of Markwayne Mullin Who Say He Is Too...
Sen. Mike Lee Blasts Senators Who 'Just Want to Go Home' After Failing...
Chinese National and Two U.S. Citizens Charged in $170M Scheme to Smuggle U.S....
Kenyan Man Sentenced in $12M Global Email Fraud Scheme
Two Romanian Nationals Get Prison Time for Attempted $1.7M Card Skimming Plot Across...
Los Angeles No Kings Protest Turns Violent As Thugs Target ICE Agents
OPINION

Housing Will Be the Last to Recover

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Housing Will Be the Last to Recover

The New York Times’ Floyd Norris repeats the same old tired argument that if only we could get the housing market going, everything would be swell. Maybe that works if somehow you believe our objective is to get back to 2005.

Advertisement

Don’t get me wrong; 2005 felt great in terms of the economy. But it was a BUBBLE, driven by false and misplaced beliefs about housing prices (not to mention lots of easy credit). The result? We built more housing than we now need or want. Norris never gets around to explaining how exactly building more housing would solve our current problem of oversupply.

Norris’ solution? Yes, the same tired, old proposal of writing down mortgage debt. Again, nowhere does he explain how forgiving mortgage debt helps to clear the oversupply of housing—because it doesn’t. As I argued before, the notion that forced mortgage write-downs creates wealth, and hence increases spending, is false. But why let facts get in the way of a blind devotion to theft as a manner of creating wealth?

The solution is not to hope our housing market turns around (if you actually want to, try these). Counter to Floyd’s bias against markets, letting prices fall and the market clear is the most workable path to fixing the housing market. The real solution to getting our economy moving is helping to transition resources out of housing and into other sectors of the economy, where they can be used to create real wealth and not simply to bid up house prices. I cannot envision a situation where we put more than half of the 2 million unemployed constructions workers back to work in residential construction any time soon. Ain’t going to happen.

Advertisement

I particularly find these positions most puzzling when they come from the Left. We’ve had a decade of stagnant wages. Why? Because we invested in running up asset (house) prices, rather than investing in capital (plant and equipment), which would have increased labor productivity and ultimately wages. Running up house prices does not increase wages or benefit the working class. It’s just a horrible form of regressive theft that benefits those with assets (houses) at the expense of those without.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement