With Details About Rob Reiner's Son Coming to Light, It Seems This Situation...
FBI Releases New Images of the Suspect in the Brown University Shooting
It's About Time: Trump Has Designated This a Weapon of Mass Destruction
If These Three Words Dominate a News Presser, You Shouldn't Go on Television
After a Shooting the Press Fired Blanks As They Aim for Gun Control;...
The Trial of Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan Started Today. Here's the Day One...
From Anxiety to Alignment: What This Week’s Data Tells Us About the Right’s...
Candace Owens Faces Erika Kirk After Months of Promoting Theories About Charlie Kirk’s...
President Trump Files $10 Billion Lawsuit Against the BBC for Edited Jan. 6...
Jake Tapper Says He’s Extra Tough on Trump to Make Up For Failing...
Progressive Podcast Host Says Charlie Kirk 'Justified' His Death Because He Supported Gun...
This Actress Had an Insane Meltdown Over Trump Calling a Reporter 'Piggy'
Sen. John Kennedy Mocks Jasmine Crockett’s Senate Bid: ‘The Voices in Her Head...
Chile Elects Trump-Style Conservative José Antonio Kast as President
Rabbi Killed in Antisemitic Terror Attack Had His Warnings Ignored by the Australian...
OPINION

Ft. Hood Victims May Get Purple Heart, Lingering Questions Remain

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

The House has finally approved recognition to the victims of the 2009 Islamic terror attack at Ft. Hood. The Senate may pass the legislation this week. However, lingering questions remain.

Advertisement

In June 2009 Islamic terrorist Major Nadal Hassan, a member of the U.S. military who had been promoted despite poor performance reviews and troubling sympathies to Islamic terrorism, opened fire on his fellow service members at Ft. Hood, Texas. Islamic terrorist Hassan killed 13 soldiers and wounded 32 others while screaming “Allahu Akbar! (God is Great!)”

Survivors of the attack, wounded and non-wounded, along with a majority of the American people, believe that these soldiers died just as their comrades did on September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon; because of Islamic terrorism.

The current administration classified the terrorist attacks, in politically correct Orwellian terms, as “workplace violence.”

Three defense secretaries, Robert Gates, Leon Pannetta, and Chuck Hagel refused to change that designation.

In an interview with Townhall.com, COL (ret) Kathy Platoni, an Army psychologist who survived the attack and has been a tireless advocate for the Purple Heart recognition for the survivors, said those who lived through the attack have suffered long enough and that “What this administration has not done in classifying this terrorist attack as what it was has led to even further suffering by the victims and their families.”

According to Dr. Platoni, survivors of the attack have spent many thousands of dollars on medical bills. Platoni’s assertion is confirmed by Congressman Roger Williams of Texas. Williams said the survivors of the attack had collectively spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to provide their own health care as victims lost their military health insurance and other benefits that would have been afforded to any wounded warrior in combat.

Advertisement

Congressman Williams cited the case of Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford, who was wounded seven times by Hassan, as one particularly egregious example of the administration’s failure to recognize the wounded. Lunsford was denied entry “into an army post-traumatic stress disorder clinic because he was not injured in combat” as reported by Susan Crabtree in The Washington Examiner.

Language was recently inserted by the House of Representatives in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which will make the Ft. Hood victims, and quite possibly other military victims of domestic terrorism, eligible for the Purple Heart. The Military Times reported that the language will award Purple Heart eligibility to “members of the armed forces killed or wounded in domestic attacks inspired by foreign terrorist organizations.”

The NDAA is up for passage in the U.S. Senate this week and victims are hopeful that the Ft. Hood language remains. Still, the survivors and families of the victims have several lingering questions to this tragedy:

1-Why was Hassan promoted despite negative performance reviews? Worse, why was he allowed to remain in the military despite his possible terrorist sympathies? Could it have been political correctness?

2-If the NDAA with the Ft. Hood amendment passes, why did it take over five years to get the recognition, and more importantly, the treatment our heroes needed from the administration? Hundreds of thousands of dollars, and countless hours of pain and suffering, could have been alleviated by the stroke of a pen.

Advertisement

3-Why did the previous stand alone act, the Fort Hood Heroes Act, die in committee which led to the “backdoor” NDAA language insertion?

4-Purple Hearts were awarded for casualties at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Why was there a different standard for that day in 2001 and not the later Ft Hood attacks? Is it the politics of different administrations? Or is it because the nation’s leaders seem to have little understanding of the conflict we are in; a generations long conflict similar to many previous wars we have fought (the Revolution, the Philippine Insurrection, Viet Nam). This conflict is multi-dimensional and no one is immune, as September 11, 2001, Fort Hood, ISIS, and countless other Islamic terror attacks inside the United States have shown. Our soldiers will continue to die at abroad and even at home.

Hopefully this recognition and treatment serves our heroes better. And hopefully it helps wake up our leaders to the long struggle against Islamic terrorism that we will continue to face as a people.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement