Living in the Lib Bubble Makes Them Lose
We Knew the LA Mayor's Results Wouldn't Be Called, but These Drunk Pratt...
Bureaucrats in the Way
The Collapse Was Not an Accident
Difficult Freedom or Easy Tyranny: Which Will America Choose?
A Mouthful of Deception
Ali Velshi's 'Deep Unease' Over America at 250
Voters Must Know Every Democrat Sent to Washington Will Hurt Our Country
Driving People Out of California
Playing With Fire – Tehran's Deadly Gambit As Economic Collapse Looms
Europe Needs Patriotism
When Businesses Leave, They Likely Won’t Be Back
Biden's Privacy Panic: 50 Years on the Taxpayer Payroll, Now Suddenly Shy About...
SCOTUS Allows Alabama's New Congressional Map to Stay in Place
Can We Stop Giving Influencers Everything Just Because They're Famous?
OPINION

What's So Bad about the Reid Plan?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
What's So Bad about the Reid Plan?
The big sticking points between the House GOP leadership and Sen. Harry Reid’s latest plan are 1) the House wants two debt increases, one this year and one next year (Reid has just one increase) and 2) the House Republicans want a guaranteed balanced-budget-amendment vote. 
Advertisement


Regarding the Reid plan itself, it really looks like a Republican plan: A $2.7 trillion spending cut to raise the debt ceiling by something like $2.5 trillion, and no tax revenues. So, really, what’s so bad about the Reid plan? Increasingly, Wall Street gurus want one debt-ceiling increase, not two. 

The Reid package includes $1.2 trillion in discretionary-spending cuts and a small $100 billion savings in mandatory accounts, apparently from the Biden meetings, although it will not impact either health care or Social Security. 

There are other nicks and knacks from waste, fraud, and abuse, fees on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, revenues from spectrum sales, and some sort of farm-subsidy reform. And there is, of course, a huge $1 trillion piece from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But that’s also in the budgets from Paul Ryan and the CBO. Interest savings come to $400 billion. 

Reid’s plan also includes a Mitch McConnell-like joint-congressional committee to find future savings. The committee’s recommendations will be guaranteed an up-or-down Senate vote without amendments by the end of 2011. 
Advertisement


The GOP House plan undoubtedly has more real spending reduction. Plus, the balanced-budget amendment, which makes it consistent with cut, cap, and balance. 

But the Reid no-tax piece is really important in terms of economic growth. At least things may not get worse on the tax front. 

Finally, all these plans hinge on tough enforcement for the spending caps. In particular, first-year 2012 savings, and then sequestration penalties. It just looks like the House and Senate are coming together.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement