Nobody’s Calling London
CNN Produces a Romance Thriller for the NYC Bombers, and David French Backs...
The Democrats’ Republic of Iran
Should the Supreme Court Reconsider New York Times v. Sullivan?
Do Public Schools Need a 'Jan. 6 Insurrection' Course?
Fix What's Broken at Home so We Can Defend Ourselves Abroad
Blue-State Suicide
Protect the Border and the Ballot Box
The Sin of Accepting Support From Jews
Iran’s New Supreme Leader: The Rise of Mojtaba Khamenei
Is Proof of Citizenship Really Jim Crow 2.0
A Landmark Verdict Sparks the Collapse of Youth Gender-Affirming Surgeries, but True Justi...
SAVE Act Lifted by Paxton-Cornyn Race
The Left Is Really Mad That We Bought Our Troops Steak and Lobster...
Trump Is Bringing Historic Changes to the U.S. Energy Sector
OPINION

Michigan Legislature Debates Outlawing Teacher-Student Sex

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Michigan Legislature Debates Outlawing Teacher-Student Sex

I guess NATSLA – that is, the “North American Teacher/Student Love Association”* – will have to look for members in places other than Michigan. That’s because the Michigan legislature will likely pass a bill that would make it a crime for teachers and students to have sex.

Advertisement

It’s incredible that such a bill is necessary. Can’t we just expect the tiny fraction of overly-randy teachers to control themselves? Apparently not.

So the full-time Michigan legislature – which is often looking for new laws to pass to fill its time – is tackling the issue head-on.

MLive.com reports:
The bill was sparked by concerns from prosecutors who said they were unable to charge teachers who had sex with students after the students turned 18, including one who waited until the day after the girl's birthday before taking to her a hotel room.

Who’s willing to bet this teacher splurged and rented a room at the Holiday Inn Express instead of the usual Super 8? Anybody?

Why aren’t the unions cleaning out their own ranks, thereby making such a bill unnecessary? It’s hard for union teachers to demand to be treated like professionals when issues like this must be addressed.

But never fear: Those deep-thinking legislators did raise some concerns.

While the measure was approved unanimously by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Steve Bieda, D-Warren, said during hearings that he had some concerns because the law would cover people such as volunteers, student teachers and adult education teachers, who might be closer in age to 18-year-old students.
Advertisement

Uh huh. And?

A comment was posted on the Michiganvotes.org site posing a similar concern:

What if a student is held back a few years, and doesn't graduate until she's 20? And what if there's a kind young man teacher, fresh out of college? Why must the state make their love a crime?

Their love doesn’t have to be a crime, as long as they wait until graduation to act on it.

Perhaps there will be a day when we can all agree that some things just shouldn’t happen, such as teachers engaging in promiscuous behavior with students. Is that really too much to ask?

*Note: Before I spark a riot, I should divulge that NATSLA doesn’t actually exist – yet. It was simply a play on words, based on the name of a well-known organization that promotes sexual relations between adults and children.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement