The DeSantis Strategy
The 2024 GOP Field Is About to Get Bigger
DHS Backs Down From Preventing Border Patrol Agents From Testifying to Congress
A Surprising Politician
The Joe Biden-Hunter Biden Scandal Convergence
This Just In: Journalistic Objectivity Is Obliterated
What Does It Take to Ensure That Policemen Are Human Beings?
Prepare for War to Avoid Having to Fight One
Democrats' Spending Threatens Americans' High Standard of Living
Democrats Represent the 40 Congressional Districts With Highest Home Values
Russian Propaganda Has Succeeded in Persuading Credulous Americans It Poses a Grave Threat...
GOP Charges Ahead on Education
When Black Police Officers Kill a Black Man, That's White Supremacy
House Republicans Are Making Moves to Boot Omar From Foreign Affairs Committee
Matt Taibbi Isn't Done Calling Out Hamilton 68

Trump and His Supporters Care About 'Wins,' Not Ideology

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

I used to worry that Donald Trump was Lonesome Rhodes in a better suit. I'm starting to wonder if he's Chance the Gardener in a worse one.

Just in case you don't get the references, Rhodes was the lead character, played by Andy Griffith, in Elia Kazan's 1957 film "A Face in the Crowd," the best movie ever made about the dangers of populism and mass media. Chance the Gardener was the lead character, played by Peter Sellers, in Hal Ashby's "Being There," a brilliant 1979 film based on the Jerzy Kosinski novel about a simple-minded gardener who had never been outside his employer's home until the man died. Because Chance speaks in fortune cookie aphorisms about gardening (and has one impeccable custom-tailored suit), he's mistaken for a man of deep wisdom and is lifted to heights of power in Washington.

President Trump isn't nearly as kind-hearted as Chance, nor as dimwitted, but there are two relevant similarities. First, both have an unhealthy addiction to television, preferring it to reading. Second, neither really understands what's going on around them but benefits from being surrounded by people who see what they want to see.

Last week, the president took the opening offer on a debt-limit deal from Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leaders in the Senate and House, respectively. A person close to the GOP leadership told Axios, "He accepted a shakedown when he was holding all the cards. ... This is quite literally a guy who watches 'ER' trying to perform a surgery."

Aghast conservatives are probably exaggerating the significance of the move in terms of policy and tactics. Fights over the debt limit rarely yield the rewards conservatives hope for. But the move could have lasting consequences.

Why? Here's a clue: According to reports, the president was ecstatic over the favorable coverage he received for his "bipartisanship."

"I got a call early this morning," Schumer told the New York Times. "He said, 'This was so great!' Here's what he said: 'Do you watch Fox News?' I said, 'Not really.' 'They're praising you!' Meaning me. But he said, 'And your stations' -- I guess meaning MSNBC and CNN -- 'are praising me! This is great!'"

Despite his "fake news" refrain, Trump doesn't hate the mainstream media the way his most ardent supporters do. They sincerely believe it's a hostile opponent in the culture war, while Trump's anger is more that of a jilted lover. His whole life has been marked by an obsession with publicity.

His supporters, though, are oddly blind to that fact. Normally, when conservatives or Republicans deviate from the party line, the knee-jerk assumption among activists is that they are doing so out of a desire to win praise from the liberal media and invitations to Georgetown cocktail parties. If that's often unfair, it may actually be the case for Trump, and yet his base insists that if he "wins," it must also be a win for conservatives. So deep is the desire to see the Trump they thought they were getting, they bend the facts to fit their heroic narrative.

The widespread animosity toward the GOP leadership among many Trump supporters only fuels the delusion that Trump can do no wrong. "Punishing" House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is now its own reward because they are part of the "globalist swamp" Trump was elected to drain.

In his "60 Minutes" interview, former White House strategist Steve Bannon insisted that the establishment is "trying to nullify the 2016 election." Never mind that the House has passed most of Trump's agenda (Obamacare repeal and replace, funding the wall, etc.). Bannon is working on the assumption that Trump has a mandate for Bannon's potted theories of "economic nationalism."

The truth is that Trump's real mandate was to be "not Hillary Clinton" -- and he fulfilled it on Day 1. With the exception of appointing conservative judges, all of Trump's other scattershot policies earned only partial support from GOP voters, which is why Ryan and most other Republicans over-performed Trump in the election.

The other truth is that Trump craves praise more than he cares about implementing his defenestrated strategist's political fantasies. And his supporters want Trump "wins" more than conservative ones, which is why we can expect more of what we saw last week.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video