LAST CHANCE: Special 48 Hour Townhall Blowout Sale
Ragin' Cajun: James Carville Went on an Unhinged Rant About the Supreme Court
What Arab Nations Are Reportedly Saying to Israel in Private Is Quite Interesting
Chevrolet Went the Anti-Bud Light Route for Their Holiday Commercial
The 'Poop Map' Debate Should Be The Standard
Confucius and the Tiger
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 194: Handel’s Messiah and The Bible
The Deceit and the Truth of Strength in Diversity
Competing Interests Undermine Our Faith in COP28
Fox News Host Stuns Audience After Calling Out Network's Decision to Fire Tucker...
More Rumors Swirl Regarding Trump's Potential 2024 VP
Vermont School District Officials Claim ‘Detransition Awareness Day’ Would Harm ‘Trans’ St...
The Border Crisis Just Got Worse
The Most Level-Headed Response on Bob Menendez Comes From... John Fetterman
Biden Plans to Shell Out Billions of U.S. Dollars To Fuel His Radical...

How Not To Respond To A Crisis - Obamacare

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

"Okay, so you made a mistake at work. You’ve just joined the least exclusive and largest club on the planet. The issue is not whether you make a mistake (and you will). What matters is how you deal with it." (excerpted from: You Don't Have To Be Smart To Own A Smartphone And Other Lessons to Excel at Your First Job After Graduation)


If it is a big mistake and everyone makes big mistakes, before making a public comment, the first step is always to make a complete assessment of the problem. That assessment has to determine both the why, the solution and the time required to achieve a solution. Some big mistakes have easy and quick solutions; others have difficult pathways to solution and these may take long periods of time. Partially solving a problem, minimizing a problem and/or blaming someone else for a problem are poor choices.

The credibility of the individual, company or government is generally on the line once a big mistake has been made. Almost nothing destroys credibility more than having the customer find out that your initial statements about the problem are one hundred percent incorrect. Worse yet, if along with the problem, the customer is also finding out that previous important representations cannot be delivered regardless of when the problem is fixed, the necessity of a perfect response is complete.

Almost always, the best first response is

"We are sorry but something has gone very wrong with xyz. As soon as we are certain we know the scope of the problem, we will be as transparent as possible and will strive to correct the problem as soon as possible. Again, we are really, really sorry for any problems you are having."

Very few people respond negatively to an honest apology.

And then there are the responses with respect to Obamacare. It is a textbook case of what not to do. These responses will haunt the program and those in place to execute it forever.


Don't Immediately Respond With What One Wishes The Problem To Be, Know What The Problem Is:

Telling the American people that the problem with the Exchange website was the volume of inquiries when there were serious software issues was a terrible mistake. This answer provided no reason that when the Department of Health and Human Services figures out what the real problems are that anyone will believe them.

Don't Pretend That Prior Promises Can Be Kept If They Cannot Kept:

The Administration should have been ready to respond as to why "If you like your insurance, you will be able to keep it" was really: "If the government thinks your insurance is OK, you will be able to keep it."

The Administration should have been ready to respond as to why "If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep him" was really: "If you want to keep your doctor, it might be much, much more expensive and the reality is that you may not be able to keep your doctor."

Consider and Have Responsible Answers For Future Uncomfortable Questions Before They Are Asked:

The Administration should have been ready to respond as to: Why was a firm that included an executive who was a college friend of the President's wife selected to create the Obamacare website without a competitive bid?

The Administration should have been ready to respond as to: Why were millions of insured Americans not informed that their health insurance plans were being terminated until late October when their insurance companies knew this at least a year ago? Was the late timing at the direction of the Department of Health & Human Services? This smells terribly of a conspiracy to keep the information from the public.


Don't Attack "Bob' When It Is Your Mistake

Blaming anyone except Democrats for a plan that garnered virtually no Republican support and which was administered exclusively by a Democratic administration will never play well with Americans who are facing significant insurance costs increases, new health insurance plans and new doctors. Americans know this plan belongs to the President.

And what now?

It is too late at this point to undo all or perhaps most of the reputational damage to the Obamacare brand. However, it is never too late to apologize and accept blame. It is never too late to be candid with respect to the promises not kept. It is never too late to choose candor over spin.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos