The intelligence community, through a series of leaks, made clear that members of the Trump campaign had been in contact with Russian agents. Given the pre-existing ties, it begs the question if those contacts were about Donald Trump and the presidential campaign or other matters. The New York Times reported that the intelligence community had seen no evidence of cooperation between the Trump campaign and Russian intelligence, which in less partisan times would cause the default presumption to be that the interaction was over other matters. Unfortunately, this is a most tribal and partisan age.
Perhaps there is something to the allegations. Perhaps not. Perhaps, given holdovers from the Obama Administration, some in the intelligence community have a vested interest in trying to sabotage President Trump's agenda. A few reports in Washington suggest intelligence agents who supported President Obama's deal with Iran made it their mission to undermine General Mike Flynn.
There is a lot of speculation, but only a few things are known for certain. We know about the Trump campaign staff ties to Russia. We know about the leaks from the intelligence community. We know there is thus far no evidence of collaboration. We know Democrats are convinced Donald Trump urged Russian cooperation in stealing the election. We know Republicans are convinced members of the intelligence community resistant to change and reform are trying to undermine the president.
We know that Donald Trump won the presidency by winning several states with less than one percent of the vote, which means Democrats have every incentive to raise doubts about the President. We know Donald Trump, based on his own tweets, no longer trusts the intelligence community. We know that members of the intelligence community have previously leaked information to put both Presidents Bush and Obama on defense.
Given these, we know this situation is going to breed further distrust. A president must be able to trust the intelligence community. The American people must be able to trust the president won his election without foreign assistance. Americans do not trust congress and no congressman has any incentive to get to the truth if it means he is unable to advance his own self-interest.
The logical course here is for the Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, to appoint a special prosecutor in a limited capacity to examine two questions. First, did the Trump campaign collaborate with Russian intelligence to undermine Hillary Clinton's campaign? Second, is the intelligence community leaking information in order to undermine President Trump?
Until these questions are answered, the partisan feuding and allegations are only going to get worse. The president's distrust of the intelligence community is going to get worse. That, in turn, will jeopardize the safety of the American people.
Many Republicans, myself included, suspect that there are elements within the intelligence community who are intent on undermining President Trump. The President's appointees intend some significant bureaucratic reforms within the intelligence community as well as scuttling the Iranian deal. They threaten the priorities and power of various career members of the intelligence community. Many Democrats, however, believe the intelligence community is behaving patriotically by exposing a presidency put in place by a foreign regime.
The American people deserve better than this. A special prosecutor with no partisan agenda would be the best means of obtaining the truth of the matter. Attorney General Sessions, for the sake of both the American people's trust in the president and the president's trust in the intelligence community, should appoint a special prosecutor quickly.