After 21 Hours of Negotiations, Vice President JD Vance Provides an Update. It's...
President Trump, You Should Shut Down the Strait of Hormuz
What Stupid Ayatollahs
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 315: Seeking God’s Love Through His Word When...
MAGA Means MAGA
If I Want Your Opinion, I'll Give It to You
Proven Deceptions and the Duty of Distrust
Those Who Have Sacrificed for Our Freedom Deserve a Day of Gratitude, and...
God, Science, and ‘The Invisible Everywhere‘
The Case for Joy in Ecclesiastes
The Only Bailout That Ever Worked
The Cross and the Classical World: Tom Holland’s 'Dominion' and the Roads That...
USDA Fraud, Bank Scheme, and Stalking Land Iowa Farmer in Prison for 13...
Mamdani Just Took His Commie Jihad Against New Yorkers One Step Further
IBM to Pay $17M to Settle DEI Allegations
OPINION

Should American Taxpayers Pay a $1 Billion Bribe to Get Syria to Drop Chemical Weapons?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Should American Taxpayers Pay a $1 Billion Bribe to Get Syria to Drop Chemical Weapons?

Maybe it’s because I have a bit of a old-fashioned moralistic streak to me, but I viscerally object to the notion that good people should pay bad people not to do bad things.

Advertisement

That’s why, a few years ago, I didn’t react favorably when the former dictator of Libya asked for several billion dollars per year to stop illegals from crossing the Mediterranean to Europe.

And this also explains why I don’t think American taxpayers should cough up $1 billion to bribe Syria’s dictator into giving up his chemical weapons.

In this interview with Neil Cavuto on Fox News, I make the basic libertarian argument that we shouldn’t be involved in Syria’s civil war, but I also make a practical argument that – if you accept that American tax dollars should be spent – it would be much cheaper to bribe a few high-level people in Assad’s government.

Since I’m not a foreign policy expert, I don’t think I said anything particularly memorable in the above segment.

But one line apparently did resonate. Here’s Senator Rand Paul, speaking later that day.

I have to admit that made my day. Sort of like when Chairman Brady mentioned Mitchell’s Golden Rule in his opening statement when I testified last week to the Joint Economic Committee.

Of course, I’d like it even better if some of my ideas actually wound up being implemented (like the flat tax or smaller government), but at least it’s nice to be noticed.

Fighting for freedom is often a thankless task in DC

Advertisement

Being a libertarian in Washington, after all, is not the easiest job. To quote former Senator Phil Gramm, it’s like trying to do the Lord’s work in the Devil’s city.

P.S. Any time I begin to get cocky and think I’m some sort of hot shot, something happens to pull me back down to earth. In my Syria interview, you may have noticed that my mouth looked a bit red. That’s because I made the mistake of eating some red candies that were in the car that took me to the interview.

As the old saying goes, you can dress me up, but you can’t take me out. That’s why I’m glad Senator Paul picked up on my line (which I stole from somebody, so I can’t really take credit) about threatening Syria with Obamacare. Otherwise, I probably would have been reluctant to even post the interview.

P.P.S. As I intimated in the interview, the best way to learn more about foreign policy is to read the scholarly writings of my colleagues from the Cato Institute. You also can’t go wrong by perusing these columns by Mark Steyn, George Will, and Steve Chapman.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement