Don’t Panic About Trump’s Iran Strategy Just Yet
60 Minutes Correspondent Drops Some Eye Roll-Worthy Remarks About the 'Bloodbath' at the...
If You Missed Last Night's NBA Finals Game, You Missed Absolute Cinema
The Truth Is Simple: Democrats Don’t Care About Anything but Gaining Power
Here Is Leftist Government
The 60 Minutes Controversy
The War No One Else Is Fighting
Trump Goes to the NBA Finals — Look Who Attacked Him
Who'll Stop the Fraud?
A Villainous Blueprint for Managed Poverty
Donald Trump Is Personally Making Antitrust Sane Again
When Abortion Has a Face
Washington's Debt Problem Is Every Investor's Problem
The GOP's Quiet Rebellion: What It Means for Trump, Congress and the Supreme...
Nine Convicted in Ohio Drug Ring That Mixed Fentanyl Trafficking With $4.5M COVID-19...
OPINION

Should American Taxpayers Pay a $1 Billion Bribe to Get Syria to Drop Chemical Weapons?

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Should American Taxpayers Pay a $1 Billion Bribe to Get Syria to Drop Chemical Weapons?

Maybe it’s because I have a bit of a old-fashioned moralistic streak to me, but I viscerally object to the notion that good people should pay bad people not to do bad things.

Advertisement

That’s why, a few years ago, I didn’t react favorably when the former dictator of Libya asked for several billion dollars per year to stop illegals from crossing the Mediterranean to Europe.

And this also explains why I don’t think American taxpayers should cough up $1 billion to bribe Syria’s dictator into giving up his chemical weapons.

In this interview with Neil Cavuto on Fox News, I make the basic libertarian argument that we shouldn’t be involved in Syria’s civil war, but I also make a practical argument that – if you accept that American tax dollars should be spent – it would be much cheaper to bribe a few high-level people in Assad’s government.

Since I’m not a foreign policy expert, I don’t think I said anything particularly memorable in the above segment.

But one line apparently did resonate. Here’s Senator Rand Paul, speaking later that day.

I have to admit that made my day. Sort of like when Chairman Brady mentioned Mitchell’s Golden Rule in his opening statement when I testified last week to the Joint Economic Committee.

Of course, I’d like it even better if some of my ideas actually wound up being implemented (like the flat tax or smaller government), but at least it’s nice to be noticed.

Fighting for freedom is often a thankless task in DC

Advertisement

Being a libertarian in Washington, after all, is not the easiest job. To quote former Senator Phil Gramm, it’s like trying to do the Lord’s work in the Devil’s city.

P.S. Any time I begin to get cocky and think I’m some sort of hot shot, something happens to pull me back down to earth. In my Syria interview, you may have noticed that my mouth looked a bit red. That’s because I made the mistake of eating some red candies that were in the car that took me to the interview.

As the old saying goes, you can dress me up, but you can’t take me out. That’s why I’m glad Senator Paul picked up on my line (which I stole from somebody, so I can’t really take credit) about threatening Syria with Obamacare. Otherwise, I probably would have been reluctant to even post the interview.

P.P.S. As I intimated in the interview, the best way to learn more about foreign policy is to read the scholarly writings of my colleagues from the Cato Institute. You also can’t go wrong by perusing these columns by Mark Steyn, George Will, and Steve Chapman.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement