Townhall Celebrates America 250
'Real Socialism' Was Tried in Venezuela, and It Failed
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 327: God’s Name in the Declaration of Independence
The Leech Has Two Daughters—Give and Give
Don’t Shop at Von’s
Mother-Daughter Duo Sentenced in $800K Wyoming Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Detroit Non-Profit Director, County Employee Sentenced for Stealing 100 Properties in Brib...
Mallory McMorrow Suspends U.S. Senate Campaign After Scandal-Plagued Run
Trump's America 250 Celebration Was One for the History Books
Gun-Grabbing Group Spends Independence Day Begging Politicians to Strip Down the Second Am...
Paul Pelosi Faces Potential Criminal Charges After Hit-and-Run Incident
These Patriots Refused to Surrender Their Independence Day Celebrations to a Summer Storm
12 Score and 10 Years Ago
Make Unsubsidized Passenger Rail a Condition of the Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern Merger
Obamacare's Fraud Bill Just Came Due
OPINION

A “Moderate” Dan Mitchell with “Few Strong Opinions” for a Kinder, Gentler Era of “Tenderness”

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
A “Moderate” Dan Mitchell with “Few Strong Opinions” for a Kinder, Gentler Era of “Tenderness”

Early this year, I took a libertarian purity test put together by Professor Bryan Caplan at George Mason University.

The good news is that I got a 94. Sounds like a solid A, right?

Advertisement

Well, the bad news is that the test wasn’t on a 0-100 scale. The maximum grade was 160, so it seems I’m just a big-government squish!

In my defense, that still ranks me above the vast majority of people in Washington.

That being said, I’m jealous that my former grad school colleague Matt Kibbe (now head of FreedomWorks) got a higher score. Here’s a summary of the test put together by Ben Domenech.

Libertarian Test Score

So what’s the real story? Am I “a high priest of light tax, small state libertarianism,” as I was described by a left-wing British journalist?

Or am I a closet statist, as suggested by a critic from Canada?

I think I belong on the former category, but I have to confess that I just took a “social attitude” test that was sent to me by a friend in London and the results are a bit disconcerting.

Social Attitude Test 2I was horrified to learn that I got a score of 18.75 for socialism. To be sure, I don’t know if that’s 18.75 percent, or 18.75 on a scale of 0-1000.

Regardless, I’d much prefer to get a score of zero on any measure of coercive collectivism.

And what’s the deal with the 40.625 for tenderness? Makes me sound like some sort of new-age wimp who goes around trying to instigate group hugs.

Advertisement

Last but not least, what’s “radicalism”? Is it simply a measure of being outside the mainstream? Without any guidance, there’s no way of interpreting that score.

Even more irritating, the accompanying analysis says that I’m a “moderate” and “a centrist with few strong opinions.”

On the other hand, it also says that I’m a “laissez-faire capitalist” and that I “would generally be described as libertarian.”

Social Attitude Test 1

My two cents, for what it’s worth, is that the analysis part of this exercise needs some work. But feel free to take the test and add your two cents to the discussion.

I’ll simply state that I can’t be a squish if my policy heroes are people like Barry GoldwaterRonald Reagan, and Margaret Thatcher.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement