Republicans Slam Biden's Claims of 'Blackmail'
Of Course, That's How the NYT Framed Three College Heads Endorsing Jewish Genocide
Suspect Identified in UNLV Mass Shooting
Enough With the Retro Reagan Cliches
Minnesota Has a Snowplow-Naming Contest, and It's Everything We Hoped It Would Be
Let Them Eat Chicken
Israel Accuses UN Chief of Hitting 'New Moral Low' With This Move
Harvard, Penn Presidents Do Damage Control After Disastrous Congressional Testimonies
Senate Republicans Block Ukraine, Israel Aid Over Border Crisis
House Authorizes Biden Impeachment Inquiry Resolution
Texas Woman Files Lawsuit Asking State for an Abortion
UN Plays the Victim As Israel Cancels Visa for Humanitarian Coordinator
Vivek Ramaswamy Takes Down Christie and Haley in Fourth Debate
An Amazing Story of Redemption Out of Pearl Harbor
You Say You Want an Intifada, Part I

Modern Monetary Theory Is Not a Magic Solution

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
AP Photo

The U.S. national debt is out-of-control, about to cross the $26 trillion threshold. As most Americans focus on the aftermath of the coronavirus pandemic and the death of George Floyd, the nation seems to be undisturbed by the rapidly approaching debt bomb that could severely stunt America’s economic future, if not spell the end of the republic.


Most Americans understand the simple concept that one cannot continue to spend more money than one earns (or in the case of the government, taxes from citizens) for months, years, let alone decades.

However, for some strange reason, Americans do not apply this same simple logic when it comes to the budget-busting federal government. If the opposite were the case, Americans would have demanded balanced budgets years ago.

It seems as if economists have been warning about the dangers of debt for years. However, their calls for reducing federal spending (or raising taxes, or both) have fallen upon deaf ears. Who knows, maybe they could be wrong. Maybe somehow, someway the United States government can avoid what has befallen so many other nations in world history: mountains of debt due to profligate spending. However, I would not hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

History is littered with examples of once-great civilizations that spent themselves into oblivion. From ancient Rome to pre-Revolution France, reckless spending on foreign wars or elaborate palaces (the Palace of Versailles being a prime example), has been one of the primary culprits in rapid downfalls of once-thriving societies.


As of now, one can make a strong argument that America is headed down the same path, unless we embark on a major change of course—and soon. Otherwise, if we continue down our current path, we too will head down the dark road to insolvency. But wait, all we have to do is print more money. Right? That will solve everything. So say some on the Left, under the guise of Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). They are woefully wrong.  

Here is MMT’s leading advocate, Stephanie Kelton, in her own words, “Deficits can help us fight a myriad of problems that plague our economy—inequality, poverty and unemployment, climate change, housing, health care, and more. But we can’t use deficits to solve problems if we continue to think of the deficit itself as a problem.”

What?! Kelton says we can use deficits to solve problems? That is like telling severely obese people to not worry about calorie counts. Twinkies and hamburgers are now “health” food that will make you lose weight, no matter how many you gorge on. Obviously, this is bunk. And obviously as well, Kelton’s crack-pot theory about deficits being good is just as bunk.

According to Kelton, “MMT starts with a really simple observation and that is that the U.S. dollar is a simple public monopoly. In other words, the United States currency comes from the United States government. It can’t come from anywhere else. And therefore, it can never run out of money. It cannot face a solvency problem, bills coming due that it can’t afford to pay. It never has to worry about finding the money in order to be able to spend. It doesn’t need to go and raise taxes or borrow money before it is able to spend.”


Has Stephanie Kelton lost her mind? Is she unaware of a nasty thing called inflation, or even worse, stagflation? Has she not read about insane inflation in places that print money willy-nilly?

Here is Kelton’s take on that pesky thing her detractors refer to as inflation. “So the best defense against inflation is a good offense, and what MMT does is to try to be I think kind of hypersensitive to the risks of inflation. I don’t see any other macro school of thought pay as careful attention as we do to the inflation risk question. And so what we would say is: Look, if you are Congress and if you are considering a new spending bill, instead of thinking about the ways in which that new spending will add to the deficit or add to the debt, you should be thinking about the ways in which that new spending has the risk of accelerating inflation. And then avoid doing that.”

Just “avoid doing that.” That is Kelton’s harebrained attempt to alleviate the huge and very warranted concern that her crazy money printing strategy will implode the U.S. economy by causing inflation the likes of which is taking place in Zimbabwe and Venezuela. Judging by this lack of logic, MMT should be renamed to Monetary Madness Theory.


The moral of the story is that deficits and debts matter. They always have and always will. And unless the United States gets its fiscal house in order ASAP, we will all pay the price—in the most literal sense of the word.

Chris Talgo ( an editor at The Heartland Institute.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos