It took threats to cut off its federal funding following anti-Semitic, anti-Israel and pro-Palestinian demonstrations for Harvard University to consider again pursuing what used to be the foundation of its motto "Veritas," or truth.
The Wall Street Journal reports that leaders of the university are discussing whether to create a center for conservative scholarship. It would mirror the Hoover Institution at Stanford University in California. That the discussion is taking place is a tacit admission that Harvard has been excluding conservative thought from its curriculum, not to mention most of its professors who toe the liberal line and teach their students to do the same.
Like the other old Ivy League schools, Harvard once had a religious and conservative foundation. Founded by Puritans in 1636, Harvard had its roots in the Puritan worldview and way of life. Its stated purpose was to train ministers and prepare students for community and civic leadership. By the mid-18th century, Harvard had evolved into an increasingly secular institution, broadening its curriculum to include a more liberal arts education and establishing a research branch. While it still has a Divinity School, that too is liberal in its theology and more aligned with a liberal political agenda.
When he was president of Harvard (1953-1971), Nathan Pusey said: "The finest fruit of serious learning should be the ability to speak the word God without reserve or embarrassment." Given what we've seen in recent months on their and other campuses it would appear that God has become an embarrassment, unless His name is used as a blasphemy.
The idea that there should be a separate institution to "study" conservatism will be an affront to some conservatives. It sounds like a form of "separate but equal." Are conservatives considered such a rare species at Harvard that their way of thinking must be studied in order to be understood? Are they a life form from another planet that could infect others if not kept away from "normal" people? Will students who study conservatism be required to wear identification badges or arm bands to identify them to liberal students and liberal professors so as to avoid possible "contamination"? Will this new branch of studies produce a conservative commencement speaker instead of the continuing stream of liberal speakers at graduation?
Over the years there have been many conservative intellectuals whose ideas and policies have demonstrated far more positive results than secular liberalism. Such thoughts and history should be incorporated into mainstream learning and not put at the "back of the bus."
One of the towering conservative intellectuals of the 20th century was the late William F. Buckley Jr. While he graduated from Yale and wrote a book "God and Man at Yale," he famously said this about Harvard: " I would rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the telephone directory than by the Harvard University faculty." Imagine what he might say now given all that has transpired at the university in recent months.
Better to have a place where conservative thought can be studied and students exposed to a different way of thinking than to have nothing at all, but even better to have that line of thinking taught alongside liberal thought. That would give conservative thought and conservative thinkers the recognition they deserve, along with examination of why conservative economic, social and foreign policy ideas have produced mostly better results than secular liberalism.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member