Treasury Secretary: Yeah, the IRS Visit to Taibbi's House Was Abnormal
State Department Urges Americans to Leave Russia After Latest Hostage Taking
AOC Melts Down After Being Confronted About Libs of TikTok Lies
Newsweek's Fact Check on Transgender Shooters Was Actually Spot-On
Biden Says 'No' to School Safety Bill
Fact Check: Is Sen. Tuberville's Hold on DoD Nominees 'Unprecedented' As Schumer Claims?
A Police Standoff That Lasted Over 30 Hours in Virginia Is Finally Over
The Armed Officers in Schools Debate Is Over...At Least It Should Be
The White House's Instagram Post About Banning Guns Is Backfiring Spectacularly
Just How Deep Does the Border Crisis Go? One Book Brings It All...
TN Reporter Desperately Claims Protesters Storming Capitol Was 'Peaceful'
Fire at Mexican Migrant Center Leaves at Least 38 Dead
'Transurrection': Activists Storm Tennessee Capitol Following Christian School Shooting
San Jose Police Union Director Charged With Trying to Import Fentanyl Into U.S.
Sen. Tuberville Reminds: 'I'm Not Blocking Anyone From Being Confirmed'

No, U.S. Autoworkers Are Not a National Security Threat

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
AP Photo/Eugene Hoshiko, File

The White House recently issued a proclamation alleging that imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts threaten to impair U.S. national security. This proclamation rests on twisted logic that excludes more than two-thirds of car manufacturing done in the United States and assumes a zero-sum-game when it comes to auto manufacturing. Auto tariffs imposed under the guise of “national security” would do more to hurt American national security than any amount of auto imports ever could.

Last year Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, called the Trump administration’s investigation into auto imports “a sham.” The White House announcement suggests he may have been right, because U.S. carmakers are not suffering under global competition. They are thriving. Perhaps that’s why the Trump administration was unable to find a single car manufacturer to support new tariffs.

After adjusting for inflation, U.S. production of motor vehicles and parts is higher now than it was in 1989. Annual exports of cars and light trucks from the United States increased from 1.1 million in 1989 to 2.8 million in 2018. While exports were increasing, the number of vehicles Americans imported from the European Union and Japan declined by 891,000. 

Given these facts, the Commerce Department had to get creative in order to justify the conclusion that auto imports threaten U.S. security. The department came up with the radical idea of segregating cars built in the United States by Honda, Toyota, BMW, and other “foreign” manufacturers from cars built in the United States by “American” manufacturers like Ford and General Motors (GM). 

The White House proclamation referred to “American-owned” automakers no less than 14 times. For example: “'American-owned producers' share of the domestic automobile market has contracted sharply, declining from 67 percent (10.5 million units produced and sold in the United States) in 1985 to 22 percent (3.7 million units produced and sold in the United States) in 2017.” 

Here’s what the White House failed to report: In 2017, according to the Federal Reserve, the United States produced 10.9 million cars and light trucks. That’s a big difference from the 3.7 million claimed by the Trump administration. 

So, how did the Commerce Department come up with its much smaller 3.7 million number? By ignoring every single car and truck made in Alabama, South Carolina, Indiana, and other states by Subaru, Volkswagen, Hyundai, and other foreign-owned manufacturers. The Commerce Department had to pretend that two-thirds of U.S. auto manufacturing does not exist in order to make it look like imports are a threat to domestic auto manufacturing. 

The department then defined any loss of market share by U.S.-owned companies to be a national security threat, whether due to imports or to U.S.-made cars assembled by American workers who work for foreign-owned companies. This methodology appears to reflect White House trade advisor Peter Navarro’s description of foreign investment in the United States as “conquest by purchase.”  

It would be bad enough if the White House thought that a job working for BMW in South Carolina was not worth as much as a job working for Ford in Michigan. But it’s worse than that. The White House appears to believe that 410,000 autoworkers who are employed by foreign-owned companies actively threaten U.S. national security by competing with U.S.-owned car manufacturers. This is an insult to these American workers. 

As Toyota put it, “today’s proclamation sends a message to Toyota that our investments are not welcomed, and the contributions from each of our employees across America are not valued.” 

More than 7.6 million Americans work for foreign-owned companies in the United States. Does the White House view them as a national security threat too? 

The auto manufacturers that the Trump Administration is cutting out of the conversation here don’t just create jobs. They bring new ideas that keep America at the cutting edge of global innovation. Japan’s investments introduced Americans to “just in time” manufacturing, and German carmakers like Mercedes and BMW are bringing their apprenticeship programs to the United States. These innovations strengthen U.S. economic security. The White House’s efforts to create artificial divisions between “American” and “foreign” carmakers, just like the tariffs it has imposed on imports provided by U.S. allies, will only make us weaker. 

Bryan Riley is the director of the Free Trade Initiative with the National Taxpayers Union, a nonprofit dedicated to advocating for consumers and taxpayers at all levels of government.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video