The Left Gets Its Own Charlottesville
Pro-Hamas Activists March on NYPD HQ After Police Start Dismantling NYU's Pro-Hamas Encamp...
A Girl Went to Wendy's and Ended Up With Permanent Brain Damage
Patriots Owner to Columbia University: Say Goodbye to My Money
Democrats Are Going to Get Someone Killed and They’re Perfectly Fine With It
Postcards From the Edge of Cannibalism
Why Small Businesses Hate Bidenomics
The Empire Begins to Strike Back
The Empires Begin to Strike Back
With Cigarette Sales Declining, More Evidence Supports the Role of Flavored Vapes in...
To Defend Free Speech, the Senate Should Reject the TikTok Ban
Congress Should Not Pass DJI Drone Ban Legislation
Republican Jewish Coalition Endorses Bob Good's Primary Opponent Due to Vote Against Aid...
Here's What Kathy Hochul, Chuck Schumer Are Saying About Columbia University's Pro-Hamas P...
Minnesota State Sen. Arrested for Burglary, Raising 'Big Implications' Over Razor-Thin Maj...

Doves vs. Oscars

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

Since 1991, the Dove Foundation has been encouraging American movie studios to make uplifting, positive entertainment with its Family Approved Seal. This year, they've launched a new initiative, an annual awards presentation akin to the Academy Awards, to honor the "best of the best" family-friendly films. They call theirs the Crystal Dove Seal.


The Dove Foundation awarded 58 films with its seal of approval in 2007, in and of itself an encouraging sign for families who would like to see movies together. The first annual awards honored the very best of these films, in six categories. Their Best Drama award winner was "Amazing Grace," the Walden film about the origins of the classic hymn. Winning the Best Comedy award was "The Game Plan," Disney's daughter-finds-father football story. The Best Action-Adventure nod went to "National Treasure: Book of Secrets." The Best Animated Film prize went to Disney-Pixar's "Ratatouille." The Best Documentary was "Arctic Tale," an anti-global warming film from National Geographic and Paramount.

Rounding out the winners was the Best Limited Release, "The Ultimate Gift," a Fox Faith film. Never heard of it? It featured some major stars -- James Garner, Brian Dennehy and new, young Oscar-nominated star Abigail Breslin. Garner's character leaves his spoiled grandson an inheritance -- but only if he performs 12 character-building tasks.

So why might you have missed it? Because if a film gets tagged as "inspirational," watch out. Film critics will drop bombs.

It was panned by the Los Angeles Times because it teeters on its "treacly good intentions and simplistic parable-like storytelling." And The New York Times for "reeking of self-righteousness and moral reprimand a hairball of good-for-you filmmaking." Then there's the simply mocking and nasty approach, from Entertainment Weekly: "Kind of like a feel-good 'Saw' for churchgoers, minus the sadistic games of death."


Not everyone was so enlightened. One of the nicer reviews came from Variety, which correctly tagged the rest of the film reviewers as cynics: "Although cynics likely will reject 'The Ultimate Gift' as warmed-over Capra-corn, this predictable but pleasant drama based on Jim Stovall's popular novel may be prized by those with a taste for inspirational uplift and heart-tugging sentiment."

Snarky film reviewers tend to look down their noses at "those with a taste" for positive films, as if they're a tiny market of weirdos. Except the market is screaming for that which Dove honors. As the Dove Foundation notes, its award-winners grossed $536 million at the box office, compared to just $295 million for Oscar's Best Picture nominees.

Oscar voters will argue, correctly, that they bestow awards for artistic merit, not "inspirational uplift." But what the Oscars honor these days is usually a list of dark, arty, "edgy" films. They're like the anti-Doves. They're for unsentimental, depressing downdraft.

The exception this year is "Juno," which is the best-grossing movie, and which is inspirational in its own teen-slacker way, even if it's still a cheaply made art film. Everything else on the list limped at the box office, films full of paranoia, ultra-violence and "There Will Be Blood," virulent religion-bashing.


The Oscars used to be populist. Now they're elitist -- in the worst definition of the term. Its nominations not only reject the major studio system, they've even trended against American-born actors. Nine of this year's twenty acting nominations went to Brits, Australians and the French lady playing the singer Edith Piaf.

The elitists are right that they shouldn't pick Best Pictures based on their box-office numbers. But the Dove awards nudge us to remember that the Oscars used to award films with both artistic merit and strong audience appeal. The films that audiences love the most, movies that quickly become "classics," are today often skipped by Oscar snobs.

Even film critics know the score. Time critic Richard Corliss wrote an interesting piece a few weeks ago that suggested there's a very good reason why the ratings numbers on the Oscar telecast have been slumping. He noted that in the old days, the Best Picture prize went to box-office hits -- "Casablanca," "The Bridge on the River Kwai" or "The Sound of Music." The mass audience had seen these movies, and they paid attention to the Oscars as they codified those hits as classics. Now, when the nominations come out, the process is backward. Some people go see the films and play catch-up after the Oscar nominations are announced. But "it's almost like homework," Corliss wrote.


The Oscar crowd might be better off doing its own "homework" by seeing the Dove-winning films they missed.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos