Graham Slams Democrats for 'Playing Games' With the Border Crisis
Speaker Johnson Lays Down a Line on Ukraine and Border Security Funding
'This Is Hell': These Eight Men Who Brutally Assaulted a Minor Won't Get...
We Know the Origin of the Gold Bars Found at Bob Menendez's House
Is This the Owner of the Home That Exploded in Northern Virginia Last...
'PR Disaster for Universities': Jewish Students Speak Out Against Administrators Amid Anti...
Everything You Need to Know About the 2024 Presidential Primaries
New Harvard Youth Poll Is Out. Here's What It Shows for Biden, Trump.
RNC Announces Who Made the Stage for 4th GOP Debate
Here's What KJP Had to Say When Asked About Jayapal's Response to Hamas'...
Arizona, the Republican Party, and Its Discontents
Jack Smith Isn't Just Going After Trump's Social Media
Hackers Obtained Access to Millions of 23andMe Profiles, Company Says
Will Republican Idiocy Ever End?
Proposed Rule From Biden Administration Takes Aim at Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers

Chris Wallace Faceplants Out of the Gate

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
Townhall Media

"Riffed from the Headlines" is Townhall's daily VIP feature with coverage of the deeply flawed aspects of journalism in the nation. We'll look to bring accountability to the mishaps, malaprops, misdeeds, manipulations, malpractice, and manufactured narratives in mainstream media.


Reporting on the Mirror – CNN

  • What is the antonym for "auspicious debut"?

Some people may be questioning when Chris Wallace is set to make his CNN premiere. We say this because Wallace has made his start at his new network – it just appears very few know of this happening. On Sunday, Chris had the first showing of "Who's Talking to Chris Wallace?" and the show has not exactly been on the lips of many people. 

The ratings came in and were more like the raspberry sound you make with your mouth.

Wallace drew only 425,000 viewers and only 46,000 in the advertiser demo. His show was beaten by Trey Gowdy on Fox News with three times the audience. To underscore how little interest there was in seeing Wallace, he managed to actually repel the audience. He lost roughly 30,000 viewers from his lead-in, and then CNN saw a jump of more than 120,000 in the following hour. 

Artisanally-Crafted Narratives – POLITICO

It is bad enough that Politico saw fit to politicize the impending hurricane set to ravage the west coast of Florida in an attempt to set up Ron DeSantis for failure based on his response. But making this all the more inept was the claim that DeSantis had yet to go through the experience of ushering his state through a hurricane disaster.

Only one small element to this approach – history. 


  • It seems the lack of evidence should not prevent a punishment.

When word came out that prosecutors might be stepping away from the prospect of prosecuting Rep. Matt Gaetz for alleged sex trafficking charges, there was a noted groan across the media landscape. It has been two years of this supposition-based story, and it appears that with little movement at all on the case, it may be coming to a close. 

Among the hardest hit appears to be Ryan Cooper of The Prospect, who seems to think there should be more action taken against Gaetz. That Cooper has long railed against fascism on his account, it is amusing to see him take this stance on the matter. 

Body Checking the Fact-Checkers – POLITIFACT

The press has run up against a bit of a paradox of their own making. Since the January 6 riot, a favored talking point has been the issue of "election denialism." Anything from contesting results to simply questioning the election process has been grounds for labeling people as anything from treasonous attackers of election integrity to wanting to render democracy and threatening the Constitution. The problem: There are quite a few examples of Democrats in recent years, umm – questioning elections. 

Hillary Clinton, Stacey Abrams, Karine Jean-Pierre, members of the J-6 Committee, and more have been shown to have been critical of election results over the past few years; how do members of the hectoring media treat these cases?

Well, if you are at PolitiFact, you come up with this cagey analysis – It's different when they do it.

Blue-Anon – MSNBC

  • Why does the left love the Handmaid's imagery so much?

It is one thing to concoct hysterical theories and use them as a form of political mockery. But when you actually compose those fever-dream-level conspiracies and send them out to the public, well…those end up framing yourself as the very type of crackpot you were alleging of your opponents. 

Democrat operative Kurt Bardella might help himself by stepping away from his appearances on MSNBC. That need to outstrip the hyperbolic claims of other panelists while on the air with Joy Reid or Nicolle Wallace is beginning to seep into his daily mindset. 

Gilded Reframe – THE GUARDIAN

The prospect of school districts banning books is such a self-made storyline that all a reporter needs is to get a few choice quotes, and they can submit their piece and hit the bars early. Of course, sometimes you run into the issue of facts screwing up the narrative, but hey – maybe the editor won't pick up on it!

The flaws emerge, though, with the core concept. Restricting some titles for age-appropriate content is not "banning books" any more than placing an R-rating on a motion picture to restrict under-17 youths is considered banning a movie. But it gets to be an even dumber accusation when the book is not restricted after all. After running the claim about a book series, "The Girls Who Code," being banned in Pennsylvania and conducting interviews with the publisher and the writers – who all appropriately displayed dismay and outrage at the restrictions – the paper had to "amend" their subheader and content.

- "A statement from officials in that district on Monday strongly denied that they had banned the book series, and called 'categorically false' information in a Business Insider interview with the founder of Girls Who Code, which reported the ban on the series. 'This book series has not been banned, and they remain available in our libraries,' the statement said."


Trending on Townhall Videos