Is the New Supreme Leader Already Dead?
Stelter Hung Out to Dry a Second Time This week – Says Network...
Progressive Crackpots Vs. Environmental Wackos
The Morality of Taxation
Healthcare Is Not a Right, Nor Should the Government Guarantee It
The Road to Tehran Runs Through Baku
The Parent-Led Rebellion Against EdTech
It’s Time to Build America With U.S.-Made Materials
DEI Is Dead. Corporate America Just Hasn’t Admitted It Yet.
Affordability Is Not a Slogan. Democrats Treat It Like One.
From Panic to Therapy: Cycle of Faux Climate Fear
President Donald J. Trump Can Index Capital Gains With Pen
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Gavin Newsom
The First Time in my Life That I Have Come into Conflict With...
Temple Israel Terrorist Died of Self-Inflicted Wound, Stuffed Truck With Accelerant and Fi...
OPINION

Govt Funding Created Too Many in Battery Space

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Govt Funding Created Too Many in Battery Space

Here’s a quick footnote to our commentary published last week about the bankruptcy announcement by Ener1, another of Obama’s failed green-energy “investments.” Ener1 manufactured lithium-ion batteries to be used in electric vehicles, EVs.  Today’s Wall Street Journal provides further reasons to question Obama’s judgment and his irresponsible stewardship of the taxpayer’s dollars. 

Advertisement

Ener1 blamed the anemic market for rechargeable battery cars and an overly competitive market place for the company’s financial woes.  That is a similar refrain to the one offered by Solyndra, the California solar energy company that went bust last September even after Obama had guaranteed $535 million in loans. 

But, flooding an uncertain, limited, nascent market with a plethora of manufacturers did not seem to bother the Obama Administration or cross anyone’s mind at the DOE.  “The battery glut was created in substantial part by the Obama Administration, which handed out money to no fewer than 48 different battery technology and electric vehicle projects in 2009,”  according to the WSJ.

Ener1 was awarded a $118 million grant by the DOE in 2009.  That’s a “grant” – as in “gift” – not a loan like Solyndra or Beacon Power, a Massachusetts green company that also went bankrupt after a $43 million DOE loan guarantee.   At least with a government loan there is an assumption, however weak, that the funds will eventually be paid back.  Not so with a grant. 

It’s far from clear why a taxpayer gift of $118 million seemed justified other than that the Obama Administration was passing out favors to just about anybody that could say “green energy” – better still if they had also contributed to the Obama campaign.  It certainly wasn’t based on prior performance.

Advertisement

The company was founded in 2002, but was never able to post a profitable year.  Even 2010, the year after the $118 million grant, Ener1 posted a $165 million loss.  That was also the year that Vice-President Biden visited the plant and said the company “was leading the way…sparking whole new industries that will ensure our competitiveness for decades to come.” 

Give Joe credit for being an eternal optimist, but he certainly isn’t very good at business.  Only Joe would claim that a company showing loses of hundreds of millions of dollars and less than a year away from bankruptcy was “leading the way” to anything but the poor house.  

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement