Did The New York Times Criticize 'Epic Fury' Using the Man Investigated for...
Gavin Newsom Is Many Things. 'Pro-Family' Is Not One of Them.
Donald Trump Is a Great Man of History
So, What Is Normal?
JFK's Grandson Proves the Networks Still Bend the Knee to Kennedys
Trump Avoiding Repeating History in Iran
Men Are Back
The Supreme Court Should Protect Children From Predators
America Must Lead the Charge Against the Political Abuse of Religion
The Rules Were Never Meant for Them
The U.S. Needs Japan More Than Ever
For America’s 250th Birthday, Make the Senate Great Again
Tony Gonzales Suspends Campaign After Finally Admitting to the Affair He Denied for...
State Department Says That U.S., Venezuela Have Re-Established Diplomatic Relations
Federal Court Sentences Illegal Alien to Prison for $343K SNAP Benefits Fraud
OPINION

Confused Investor? Yeah.

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Confused Investor? Yeah.

Just like much of America, I’m a very confused investor. 

For decades, I was taught that a good investment was worth holding for the long-term.  Historically, in most instances, when somebody thinks of an investment, they’re not thinking of artwork, a house, jewelry (gold), or even government bonds — it’s stocks. 

Advertisement

From 1982 until 1999, we all witnessed the greatest bull market in contemporary history.  Buying-and-holding was the credo of Wall Street, and more specifically, mutual funds. 

Thus, when the U.S. was experiencing its golden age in technology, it only made sense to be part of it by being a stockholder. 

Such stalwarts as Jeremy Siegel, Jack Bogle, and even Warren Buffett, said my wealth would grow if I just stayed in the game for the long haul. 

Yet, starting in 2000, we experienced a decade filled with roller coaster markets and I ended up at pretty much where I had started, with essentially no return on my investment.  Consequently, all the so-called experts agreed that buy-and-hold was truly dead. 

Therefore, in order to avoid another lost decade, I signed on with market timers, hedge fund managers, technical analysts, and even opened my very own day trading account. 

However, I found that when we should have sold, we bought.

 And when we were in, we should have been out and vice versa. 

In addition, I learned new investing terms such as “high-frequency traders” and “flash-crash,” all while discovering that some of the old-timers, like Bill Miller and even George Soros, stopped managing other people’s monies; it seemed that it became just too difficult for them.  Nevertheless, in this day and age with the stock market nearing all-time highs, the pundits are saying that I should give up the losing game of day trading and revert back to the old buy-and-hold game. 

Advertisement

I must admit there are days when I just feel like giving it all up as I contemplate depositing my money in the bank, but a Ben Bernanke induced 0.10% interest-rate doesn’t excite me whatsoever. 

On the other hand, now that we’re back at the starting point where we all began, maybe I’ll start to feel comfortable once again. 

Yes, with long-term investing back in style perhaps I’ll start to realize some sort of capital gain on that Eastman Kodak stock that I purchased for $94 per share back in the day. 

Furthermore, I’ll also know what to do with the Apple, Inc. shares that I recently purchased for $690. 

Of course, it’s buy-and-hold.

You have no choice.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement