Trump Just Blew Up the Media's Narrative on Iran With a Single Post
Fetterman Goes Nuclear On Platner Over Sexually Explicit Messages
The United Kingdom Just Banned These Anti-Israel Influencers, and Now They're Crying About...
Turns Out James Talarico's Church Spends Lots of Money on Woke Causes
Michigan Republican Rep. Bill Huizenga Introduces 'Deport the Terrorists Act'
Kathy Hochul Tried Dunking on Greg Abbott Over Men in Women's Sports and...
The Emotional Displacement of Losing a Part of Your Community
Texas Republican Candidate Blasts Democrats Over 'Sham' School Shooting Statistics
Keep Politicians Out of College Sports
Jerome Powell Is Out as Fed Chair, But He Is Still Taking Swipes...
Mamdani Is Running the Classic Socialist Playbook: Blaming Capitalism for Problems the Gov...
Bernie Sanders Doubles Down on His Support For Graham Platner Despite Disgusting Controver...
Starmer Lets Sikhs Keep the Knife That Killed Henry Nowak — but Won't...
Teen Who Raised Donations to "Fight White Supremacy" Faces Trial for Murder
Washington Governor Thinks Menopause Is a Workplace Impairment, Signs Executive Order for...
OPINION

A Return to Banks

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
A Return to Banks

What happens if we start all over again?  Impossible, you say? 

Well, I’m not so sure. 

Let’s take the banks. 

On second thought, you take the banks; I want nothing to do with them.  However, if I must, I will. 

Advertisement

First, return to Glass-Steagall and keep the fire-wall between investment banking and commercial banking. 

No loop holes, no end runs, straight lending versus investment. 

Since the elimination of Glass-Steagall in 1999, we’ve experienced the dot-com crash, the housing collapse, the credit crisis, and now the European meltdown. 

So, how’s it working out for you so far?  

In addition, for the last few years, in order to protect Glass-Steagall players, interest rates have been kept artificially low. 

This action has deprived retirees and others of any return at all on CDs, saving accounts, or money market accounts. 

This forces most to take risks they would normally not take in order to achieve returns that are desperately needed in order to make ends meet. 

The argument goes if banks are forced to only be in the business of lending, they will not be able to make enough money.  

They simply will not have enough assets to lend out. 

This problem may be solved my taking the radical step of eliminating money market accounts at all institutions other than commercial banks. 

Advertisement

Paul Volcker once said the beginning of the end was the creation of money markets.  He said it forced the banks to get creative through financial engineering to leverage the money currently held on their balance sheets.  Returning money markets to the banks would increase the lending pool and make banking profits grow. 

I have no problem with securitization, derivatives, CDOs, CDSs, SIVs, and any of a dozen other products that have been created over the past several years.  

My problem is when they blow up, and they usually do, it’s the taxpayer’s money (that’s both you and I) which is used to bail out the banks.  

The return of Glass-Steagall and the elimination of money markets would be the first step in getting us back on the right path. 

Maybe this time by “starting all over again” we’ll finally get it right. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement