'Iron Lung' and the Future of Filmmaking
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Just Days After Mass Layoffs, WaPo Returns to Lying About the Trump Admin
Nigerian Man Sentenced to Over 8 Years for International Inheritance Fraud Targeting Elder...
Florida's Crackdown on Non-English Speaking Drivers Is Hilarious
Family Fraud: Father, Two Daughters Convicted in $500k USDA Nutrition Program Scam
American Olympians Bash Their Own Country As Democrats and Media Gush
Speculation Into Iran Strike Continues As Warplanes Are Pulled From Super Bowl Flyover...
OPINION

A Return to Banks

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

What happens if we start all over again?  Impossible, you say? 

Well, I’m not so sure. 

Let’s take the banks. 

On second thought, you take the banks; I want nothing to do with them.  However, if I must, I will. 

Advertisement

First, return to Glass-Steagall and keep the fire-wall between investment banking and commercial banking. 

No loop holes, no end runs, straight lending versus investment. 

Since the elimination of Glass-Steagall in 1999, we’ve experienced the dot-com crash, the housing collapse, the credit crisis, and now the European meltdown. 

So, how’s it working out for you so far?  

In addition, for the last few years, in order to protect Glass-Steagall players, interest rates have been kept artificially low. 

This action has deprived retirees and others of any return at all on CDs, saving accounts, or money market accounts. 

This forces most to take risks they would normally not take in order to achieve returns that are desperately needed in order to make ends meet. 

The argument goes if banks are forced to only be in the business of lending, they will not be able to make enough money.  

They simply will not have enough assets to lend out. 

This problem may be solved my taking the radical step of eliminating money market accounts at all institutions other than commercial banks. 

Advertisement

Paul Volcker once said the beginning of the end was the creation of money markets.  He said it forced the banks to get creative through financial engineering to leverage the money currently held on their balance sheets.  Returning money markets to the banks would increase the lending pool and make banking profits grow. 

I have no problem with securitization, derivatives, CDOs, CDSs, SIVs, and any of a dozen other products that have been created over the past several years.  

My problem is when they blow up, and they usually do, it’s the taxpayer’s money (that’s both you and I) which is used to bail out the banks.  

The return of Glass-Steagall and the elimination of money markets would be the first step in getting us back on the right path. 

Maybe this time by “starting all over again” we’ll finally get it right. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement