Put Dems on the Spot With Small but Popular Affordability Hacks
Some Victims Are More Equal Than Others
Jen Psaki Complains President Trump Takes Action on Tankers Her Former Boss Biden...
The 2026 and 2028 Elections Will Be More Decisive Than 2024
Ever Again
The One and the Many
What Rob Reiner Said About and Did to Donald Trump
Don’t Be Sorry the U.S. Missed the COP 30 Party
Observations on a Torrent of Bad News
America Is Surviving, Not Living – and It's Breaking Us
‘Mamdani-Marts’ Won’t Give New Yorkers a Free Lunch
HHS Should Advance Medicine, Not Expand the Deaths of the Unborn
Payback Is Great Under Trump, but Conservatives Should Look to the Future
President Trump Touts Massive First Year Wins in Primetime Address
Chinese-Owned Real Estate Firms Agree to $7.3M PPP Fraud Settlement
OPINION

Bah Humbug: 'Tis The Season to be an Analyst

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

It’s earnings season, and once again, ‘tis the season to be jolly.  

It never fails to amaze me how every quarter the pundits drool over the corporations beating analysts’ expectations.

Advertisement

In no way do I want to contribute to unemployment, but perhaps the most useless profession is equities analyst. 

However, every bank, brokerage firm, mutual fund, and broker dealer seems to differ with my opinion because they employ dozens of these people. 

Years ago, equities analysts were the mainstay of Wall Street.  They would take the time to personally visit certain corporations in order to perform hands-on research, query the management, and witness production firsthand. 

In essence, they got up close and personal. 

The analysts did the grunt work that produced honest and accurate numbers, and they would report exactly what they believed was going to happen based upon firsthand knowledge. 

Unfortunately, the government, in its infinite wisdom, believed that relationships between corporate management and certain analysts got too cozy. 

Therefore, they decided to make it a level playing field. 

All information that was provided to one group had to be provided to all. 

What was once on-site in-depth research reverted to in-office estimates, so it became very easy for these analysts to sit back and simply throw some numbers against the wall. 

For as many quarters as I can remember, corporations have beaten the analyst’s expectations about 75% of the time. 

So, let me get this straight, quarter after quarter, analysts get their predictions wrong 75% of the time?  

Advertisement

Yet, they’re still listened to, fawned over, and taken for gospel.  

No one could be wrong for so long and still be considered a benchmark.  

That being said, it is possible that these same analysts simply lowball their figures so that corporations seem to be doing better than expected? 

You’ll hear the pundits say “the great earnings season,” “better than expected,” “a terrific surprise,” when in reality all that’s happened is that expectations have been lowered.  

It would seem to me the easiest way to establish earnings performance is to simply compare quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year figures.

This would create a true picture of what the company is doing in the trajectory of growth through sales and earnings.  

The guesswork would be removed, however, so would the need for equities analysts.  

Oh well, since Vegas has its bookies, I guess Wall Street must have its analysts.  

Come to think of it, being wrong (hitless) 75% of the time in baseball would probably get you a multi-million dollar contract. 

Go figure.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement