It's Now Up to the Supreme Court to Decide If This Trump Order...
Here’s Who Stopped a Crazed Muslim's Stabbing Rampage in Paris
Wait, *THAT'S* Seattle PD's Description of the Person of Interest in Food Festival...
House Dem Pitches Dating Ban Since Her Party Has Been Wrecked by Multiple...
Atlanta Resident Facing Federal Charges for Using 'Duress Password' to Wipe Phone During...
You Won't Believe How Mamdani Responded to Families of 9/11 Victims About Memorial
The WHCA Dinner Gave the Press Morning Sickness
The Dummheit of Berlin Pride
John Fetterman Blasts the DSA 'Big Tent' Nonsense From His Party
Buyer's Remorse? 'Remove Mamdani' Protests Are Popping Up in the Big Apple
Turns Out 'Trans Inclusive' NHS Wards Led to Women Being Assaulted
A Milwaukee Woman Is in Hot Water for Scamming Renters
Democrat NY Rep Stays Silent on His Party's Socialist Rise
Bryan Kohberger Seeking New Trial, Rescinds Guilty Plea in Idaho Murder Case
There's 'Not Much Time' for Iran to Make a Deal With Trump
OPINION

Judge rules against Calif. gay therapy ban

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Judge rules against Calif. gay therapy ban
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP) -- In what is being called a victory for religious liberty and parental rights, a federal judge has ruled against California's controversial new law that bans change therapy for gay teens.
Advertisement

The first-of-its-kind law, signed by Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown in September, prevents licensed counselors from trying to change a minor's sexuality, even if the therapy is desired by the patient.

Judge William B. Shubb issued a temporary injunction Monday (Dec. 4) preventing the law from being enforced against the three plaintiffs in the case. But while Shubb's ruling was limited, he indicated he eventually would strike it down altogether. The day after Shubb's ruling, a federal judge in a second case upheld the law.

The law is scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1.

"Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their ... claims based on violations of their rights to freedom of speech under the First Amendment," Shubb wrote. " ... The Supreme Court has recognized that physician speech is entitled to First Amendment protection because of the significance of the doctor-patient relationship."

Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) filed the lawsuit. PJI President Brad Dacus said the law violates religious freedom, free speech and the rights of parents.

"It is not unusual for a judge to limit the injunction just to the plaintiffs themselves," Dacus told Baptist Press. "But the injunction is not based upon particular nuances or facts solely related to our client, but rather is prefaced upon the statute on its face being likely to be found unconstitutional."

Advertisement

The law states, "Under no circumstances shall a mental health provider engage in sexual orientation change efforts with a patient under 18 years of age." Any mental health providers who attempt such counseling could lose their license, the law adds.

Shubb was nominated by President George H.W. Bush.

"California has arguably survived 150 years without this law and it would be a stretch of reason to conclude that it would suffer significant harm having to wait a few more months to know whether the law is enforceable as against the three plaintiffs in this case," Shubb wrote.

Michael Foust is associate editor of Baptist Press. Get Baptist Press headlines and breaking news on Twitter (@BaptistPress), Facebook (Facebook.com/BaptistPress ) and in your email ( baptistpress.com/SubscribeBP.asp).

Copyright (c) 2012 Southern Baptist Convention, Baptist Press www.BPNews.net

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement