'Iron Lung' and the Future of Filmmaking
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Just Days After Mass Layoffs, WaPo Returns to Lying About the Trump Admin
Nigerian Man Sentenced to Over 8 Years for International Inheritance Fraud Targeting Elder...
Florida's Crackdown on Non-English Speaking Drivers Is Hilarious
Family Fraud: Father, Two Daughters Convicted in $500k USDA Nutrition Program Scam
American Olympians Bash Their Own Country As Democrats and Media Gush
Speculation Into Iran Strike Continues As Warplanes Are Pulled From Super Bowl Flyover...
OPINION

Facebook, others, urged to allow free speech

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
WASHINGTON (BP) -- Media giants such as Facebook, Google and Apple should voluntarily abide by the First Amendment's free speech requirement and fulfill their role as "gatekeepers to new web-based communications platforms," according to a new proposal from the National Religious Broadcasters.
Advertisement

NRB presented its proposal Wednesday (Sept. 12), underscoring its concern that new media companies have stifled religious free speech. NRB offered the recommendation in a new document, "Free Speech Charter for the Internet," made public at a Washington, D.C., news conference.

"We are calling on the better angels of their nature to come up out of the shadows to dialogue with us and others about solving this problem because it will increase, I believe, not decrease," said Craig Parshall, NRB senior vice president and general counsel, as well as director of the association's John Milton Project.

Though media corporations are privately owned and have the property rights to their own devices, they do not have the right to demand individual users change their view or content upon condition of being published, NRB said.

NRB's proposal could provide significant, large-scale change, said Charles Haynes, senior scholar at the First Amendment Center.

"There are millions of Americans who will be responsive to this message," Haynes told Baptist Press. "The more people who are seen as outraged and upset, the more likely these sites will change."

NRB offered the proposal as a solution to the religious censorship problem it noted in last September's report, "True Liberty in a New Media Age." The new report calls on giant web-based corporations to enhance a free marketplace of ideas by "voluntarily adopt robust, free speech standards."

Advertisement

NRB's report included many examples of religious censorship throughout the Internet:

-- The most recent instance of censorship cited occurred when Facebook took down a page created by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee that called for a Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day. This took place soon after Dan Cathy, Chick-fil-A's president, acknowledged his unabashed support for traditional marriage between a man and a woman. The page was removed for 12 hours but restored after a public outcry.

-- Of its 425,000 apps, iTunes barred from its store the Manhattan Declaration, a Christian statement created in part by the late Chuck Colson that promotes traditional marriage and the sanctity of life. It took the same action against Exodus International, a Christian support system for individuals and families affected by homosexual issues.

-- YouTube removed the video of a rabbi giving a documentation of the Old Testament view of traditional marriage and a series of documentaries of pro-lifer Lila Rose's undercover work at Planned Parenthood clinics that showed employees supporting unethical or illegal practices.

"Successful platforms of communications are now becoming an engine of constraining speech," said Frank Wright, NRB's president and chief executive officer.

Though such media giants are not required to allow free speech under constitutional law, NRB is stressing the benefits for these companies if they do give voice to the complete marketplace of ideas. Instead of acting on the whim of the greater public, they will have set a standard by which to build free enterprise and speech for all, according to NRB.

Advertisement

"It is bad precedent to say we can censor what we don't like," said Brian Walsh, executive director of the American Religious Freedom Program, during a panel discussion after the release of the NRB document at the National Press Club.

NRB has sent individual letters to Apple, Google and Facebook regarding its proposal but has received no response.

--30—

Anne Reiner, a senior at Geneva College in Beaver Falls, Pa., is attending the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities' Washington Journalism Center this semester and serving as an intern with Baptist Press. Get Baptist Press headlines and breaking news on Twitter (@BaptistPress), Facebook (Facebook.com/BaptistPress ) and in your email ( baptistpress.com/SubscribeBP.asp).

Copyright (c) 2012 Southern Baptist Convention, Baptist Press www.BPNews.net

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement