Chinese People Bravely Stand Up to CCP's Draconian COVID Policies
The Biggest Townhall VIP Sale Ever
Early Voting Kicks Off Ahead of Georgia Senate Runoff
Democratic Senator's Admission Dumps Cold Water on Joe Biden's Gun Control Agenda--For Now
Handgun Owners Carrying Daily Doubled Thanks to Soft-on-Crime Woke Policies
National Border Patrol President Slams Biden For 'Lying' About Border Crisis
The Biden Administration Could Face Audits Over the Billions it Sent to Ukraine
Trump's Close Allies Are Calling Him Out Over Controversial Dinner
Study Blames 'Misinformation' and 'Fear Mongering' For Adverse Covid-19 Vaccine Side Effec...
Just How Dumb Do Democrats Think Their Donors Are?
A Quick Bible Study, Vol. 141: The Inspiring Faith Chapter - Hebrews 11
Railway Strike Threatens U.S. Consumers
With Newsom Not Running For President, Who Will Challenge Biden in 2024?
GOP Promises to Take Control of Biden's Reckless Spending ASAP
Unredacted Documents Reveal Fauci Tried to Shift the Narrative On the Covid-19 Lab...

Fundamental Transformation

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

Book 15 of Ovid’s Metamorphoses contains a little synopsis of his epic, and of his Pythagorean philosophy: “nothing in all the world remains unchanged. All things are in a state of flux, all shapes receive a changing nature. Time itself glides on with constant motion, ever as a flowing river. Neither river nor the fleeting hour can stop its constant course. But, as each wave drives on a wave, as each is pressed by that which follows, and must press on that before it, so the moments fly, and others follow, so they are renewed. The moment which moved on before is past, and that which was not, now exists in Time, and every one comes, goes, and is replaced.”

It is beautiful poetry, and a profound truth about life: as Heraclitus says, no man steps into the same river twice. Change happens whether you like it or not, whether you want it to or not.

That doesn’t mean that change is good. Some change is good, certainly. The entire history of science and technology is one of accumulated knowledge. But in other aspects of life—philosophy, religion, culture—things are not always getting better. Progress is not inevitable; it takes work. Liberty is always only one generation away from extinction, as President Reagan said.

The liberals promised us change, and they have delivered it. What was so convenient about President Barack Obama’s slogan of “Change” was that it could mean anything. It made no promise to be good.

And the change has been unmistakably bad. This past week, we learned that the American economy actually shrunk in the fourth quarter of 2012. If it shrinks again this quarter, we will officially be in another recession. After the worst post-recession recovery since the last liberal to get re-elected with a majority of the popular vote, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, we’re ready to go right back into another recession, and another terrible recovery.

We have the largest national debt of any nation in the history of mankind. That’s certainly a change from the booming postwar years, in which we became the wealthiest and fastest-growing nation in the history of mankind. What a change a generation makes.

Even our most basic institutions are changing. Outgoing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced recently, following a disturbingly characteristic leak from the Obama Administration, that it was now policy that women are to be allowed in combat areas.

Is this good change? Ask yourself: is this going to make our military stronger or weaker? No one seems to be arguing that it will. Like ending “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” it is presented as “fairness,” as “justice” and “equality.” Does anybody think this is actually good policy from a military perspective? Both of these decisions amount to lowering standards.

Are women entitled to fight? Is anyone entitled to serve in the military? This attitude of “fairness” seems to get it completely backwards. It is yet another victory for the Self-Esteemists. I often wonder what modern history would look like without that disastrous Freudian idea that low self-esteem is objectively bad and high self-esteem objectively good. I wonder what would happen if we were not always so busy trying to make everyone feel good about themselves, and instead encouraging people to be worth feeling good about. The entire gay-rights movement, and much of the third-wave feminist movement is the bastard child of this Freudian error. There is no point in feeling good about yourself unless you have a reason to.

Unit cohesion will never be the same. Now homosexuals and women alike will be in combat. It is axiomatic that people bond in different ways with different people. In other words, this new arrangement is explicitly not equal to the previous one. Does anybody think unit cohesion will be easier now? Of course not. It will be more difficult, and unequivocally so in some cases.

And so we are becoming Europe not only in our inability to pay our debts, but also in our ability to defend ourselves. As Justice Scalia has lamented, this is quickly becoming a country I do not recognize, and, sadly, change is coming in increasingly negative ways. Greece is a small country: its implosion is only a fraction of what the American implosion will look like. We’re not entitled to high national self-esteem. We need to be honest about the direction of this country, and reverse course where necessary. In other words, we need change.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video