We Finally Have a Fighter Who Fights for Us
Wes Moore Laughably Smears This Paper as ‘Right Wing’ After They Might Have...
Trump Dropped Some Bombs Tonight, But Not on the Iranians
Artemis II Mission Offers Inspiring Unity for a Deeply Divided Nation
Seize Fire
Bigger Refunds, and the Timing Couldn’t Be Better
Dana Bash Redefines CNN's Democrat Spin As 'Objective Reporting'
39 Days: Too Much or Not Enough?
Four Policies. Four Failures. Zero Accountability.
We Can’t Allow Activist Attorney Generals to Undermine Our Economy
Happy Birthday, USA: Trump Gifts America Its History Back
There Must Be More
Illegal Immigrant Found Guilty on 9 Counts of Assault for Groping Teenage Girls...
Florida Man Sentenced to 5 Years for $4.5M Military Fuel Fraud
Border Patrol Arrests Four British Nationals for Illegal Entry from Canada into Maine
OPINION

Clinton and Obama Don’t Offset Econ Plans

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Clinton and Obama Don’t Offset Econ Plans

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have competing billion dollar proposals to prevent recession, but neither included ways to offset the spending in their plans.

Advertisement

Obama presented a $75 billion “economic stimulus” package two days after his top Democratic rival Hillary Clinton proposed spending $70 billion to jumpstart the economy. Clinton released her plan on Friday, January 11 in a speech in the greater Los Angeles area. Obama unveiled his on Sunday, January 13.

Unlike Clinton’s plan, Obama’s features an immediate $250 rebate for 150 million low to middle income workers and a $250 “bonus” for Social Security recipients. If employment numbers continued to decline over the next three months, Obama would reissue both of the $250 checks.

Clinton’s plan also included $25 billion in heating subsidies for low-income Americans and $5 billion for “green collar job growth” that Obama’s did not.

Both of the Democratic presidential candidates’ proposals would give hefty subsidies to those who face home foreclosure. Clinton supports establishing a $30 billion fund to help subprime mortgage borrowers make payments. Obama suggested spending $10 billion for “pre-foreclosure counseling” and $10 billion to be issued to state and local governments to alleviate housing problems.

Clinton and Obama separate packages also included $10 billion to expand unemployment insurance.

Advertisement

Neither candidate has devised a way to pay for their programs.

NBC Anchor Tim Russet told Clinton “You don’t pay for it,” on “Meet the Press” Sunday.

She told him, “I have paid for everything,” but Russert interjected “but not for this [economic] stimulus package.”

Clinton said, “Stimulus shouldn’t be paid for.”

Similarly, Obama’s economic advisor Austan Goolsbee has told reporters an offset is not needed. “The goal is to get the money into the economy,'' he said. “If you put it in and take it out at the same time you don't have a stimulus.” Link:

When Congress resumes, Democratic leadership will attempt to shape some kind of economic package that could resemble Clinton’s or Obama’s. President Bush has engaged in some talks about doing so, but insists tax cuts are used rather than expanding federal programs or increasing state aid.

Bush is expected to announce some kind of plan in his forthcoming State of the Union speech on January 28.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement