January 20, 2013
People have an incredible knack for self-preservation that nations sometimes, surprisingly, lack.
The United States of America is not unalterably locked into future bankruptcy, taking you and me and hordes of other innocents down together. But the road to that fateful — if not in ways “fatal” — day now lies stretched before us like a superhighway.
Indeed, it is the path of least resistance.
“For all the bitterness in Washington these days,” Ezra Klein wrote last week in the Washington Post, “it’s easy to miss the broad consensus that undergirds our contentious politics.”
That consensus, as Klein notes, has Democrats victorious in “the debate over what the government should do” (everything!) and Republicans “mostly” prevailing on “how much the government should tax. Sadly, the two sides of that equation don’t come anywhere near to adding up.”
So, the federal government still does today everything it couldn’t afford to do yesterday and promises to do much, much more it can’t afford tomorrow. Sure, it will tax rich folks just a little bit more for their obnoxious success, but it will carry on as usual, plunging ourselves more than $1 trillion further into debt each year. This despite the fact we’ve already piled up nearly $17 trillion in debt, tripling our national IOUs in the last twelve years.
Even if the men and women elected to Congress, and thrust into the role of money managers at our Madoff-on-the-Potomac, see the fiscal catastrophe approaching, will they speak out? Will they demand spending cuts, impose (foolishly, in my view) tax increases, or reform the entitlement programs that account for nearly two-thirds of all federal spending?
They haven’t yet. Even knowing that Medicare’s trustees just announced the Medicare spending will outstrip Medicare payroll taxes by 2024.
Recommended
In fact, the most often hurled charge during last year’s campaign by both Republicans and Democrats, was each claiming that the other was trying to cut $700 billion from Medicare. If only it were true! This seemingly massive cut, which helped make Obamacare look fiscally less damaging and then was accepted in Paul Ryan’s budget, is largely a phony promise to make phantom cuts, stopping fraud and waste — just like they’ve been promising with no noticeable result for decades.
Medicare, taking into account Obamacare, is expected to double its dollar figures in the next ten years — even as Congress supposedly cuts $700 billion. Or put another way, ten years from now, the federal government will be spending almost as much more for Medicare, yearly, than will have been supposedly cut in all ten years combined.
Congress can’t even put together a straight piece of legislation when the country is teetering on the ledge. The fiscal cliff bill was larded up with all manner of million-dollar, billion-dollar giveaways to special interests. In the face of skyrocketing debt, the bill raised taxes, preserved pork barrel politics, and left entitlements and spending untouched.
Apparently, no one ever said or wrote that, “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.”
Or “When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.”
Or that “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the majority discovers it can vote itself largess out of the public treasury.”
But the statements make so much sense in describing America today that they’ve been attributed Ben Franklin and Alexis de Tocqueville . . . and some Scottish fellow, named Alexander Fraser Tytler, or Lord Woodhouselee.
I’ve long noticed that when citizens vote directly on issues, through ballot initiatives and referendums, they are far more frugal than are the legislators and executives they elect to public office.
It says a lot that, at the federal level, we have no direct say.
In the coming years, we citizens must find a way to enforce fiscal sanity on our governments by ballot initiative at the state and local level as well as by saying “No” at the federal level — to politicians bearing gifts, bought with borrowed money and leaving behind a bill that’s coming due. [further reading]
Join the conversation as a VIP Member