Join the Debate
321 Comments So Far
« Previous1234Next »
Norman65 Wrote: Aug 03, 2011 7:51 AM
People fear the Tea Party because they are the people, and Jefferson said we should always respect we the people
ghjdfghdtregsfg Wrote: Aug 02, 2011 1:34 AM


ONLINE STORE :

www styleown com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) More pictures available on our website --
3) Perfect quality, small order accepted .
4) 100% safe door to door delivery, within 5 - 7 days air express for small orders .
5) We have lots of jerseys in stock
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www styleown com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6) Letters and number are sewn on b2cshop body, 100% embroidery
7) Size: .48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 60
8) Delivery by UPS, DHL, EMS door to door
9) Delivery in 5 - 7 days
-----------------------------
Anonymous15759 Wrote: Aug 01, 2011 10:50 AM
let's replace john boehner -- he is not doing the job that the conservatives want. no more increase in the debt. we must live within our means
Darkness Fish Wrote: Aug 01, 2011 3:31 PM
2 days ago I would have vehemently disagreed with this. This deal shows that Boehner, while doubtless in a tough spot, needs to go.
rose217 Wrote: Aug 01, 2011 8:17 AM
Better concentrate on replacing Obama and Reid.
Janet340 Wrote: Aug 01, 2011 11:10 AM
I agree Obama and Reid both need to go
Anonymous14333 Wrote: Aug 01, 2011 5:58 AM
The plan is simple! Even Congress can understand it!
1, Cancel all new programs we didn't have in 2006, Stop all start up building, [except direct life saving projects] default on government projects (pay the change of contract fine saving 85% of costs).
2. Change the Diamond Ret. programs - NO gov'mnt official, laborer to Pres, gets lifetime retirement plan for 3 yrs service. Equate to military ret. plan; % of years service (prorated). Phased out 10 years then small amount vs time when their graft harvest has matured, if manured,
3, Reinstate "desired skills" quota for immigration = to US Needs. (Sorry, filled with idiot socialist bomb makers).
4. Term limits for all. Not leader for 5 yrs. where influenced
Taxation With Representation Is Now Tyranny! Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 4:24 PM
Between Boehner and McConnell, we should be hearing pretty shortly that they compromised with Reid and pals and came to an agreement to cut 93 cents from the budget spread out over the next 45 years. Boehner will tell us this is the best we could hope for, McConnell will babble on about maybe straightening things out in the 2036 elections, and McAmnesty will hail it as a victory over the Hobbits in the republican party.

Lastly, Chris "The Pomerainian on Crystal Meth" Mathews will orgasm on national television and Rachel Mad Dyke Maddow will proclaim a national day of rejoicing for more AIDS research funds.
Dorthy Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 9:43 AM
The Tea Party has no leaders. And we will do without thank you very much.
Birdman III Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 10:47 PM
The Tea Party is not a party per se... it is the people, as in "We the People". We wanted to elect leaders to serve and represent us in the last election. But they were immediately compromised when the landed at the airport in DC. Maybe there is something in the air there. Perhaps we should purify the air, water and land. It does not seem to do any good electing new people... yet.
Dorthy Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 9:38 AM
No we just want to encourage him to battle fiercely. I think he needs some sleep. He is getting saddlebags under his eyes. I believe Boehner's heart is true and I believe he is able to take on the evil and corruption in Washington DC. But we must give him strength and prayers.
LouLouise Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 11:13 AM
Unfortunately, Boehner is a GOP elitist. He is no constitutional conservative.
Boehner cares nothing about evil and corruption in DC unless it interferes with his turf.
His constituents can keep reelecting him if they choose but he has no business being in a leadership position.
Sam22 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:55 PM
Joseph Story - "Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded, because they flatter the people, in order to betray them."

Become a fan of the Federalist Papers

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Federalist-Papers/99642522938


Checkout the book "Rediscovering the Constitution in the 21st Century".

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rediscovering-the-Constitution-in-the-21st-Century/207839695918225
LouLouise Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:12 PM
Boehner and McConnell must be removed from leadership positions.
Barak Ochimpo Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 12:56 PM
WE2005, was it racist when you dirty little socialist street urchins called Bush a chimp? And if not, why not?
LouLouise Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:10 PM
It's not racist to call Bush a chimp because he doesn't look like a chimp.
On the other hand, Odingo DOES look like a chimp--so it's racist.
Get it?
Barak Hussein OCorpse Man Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:32 PM
Louise, that's really a great explanation. While no liberal will ever admit it, to most of them Obama DOES look like a chimp. No wonder they are so sensitive about this!
Dorthy Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 9:40 AM
NO----Georgie did look like a cute little chimp. Which is really adorable. Paint the Wicked Witch of the West purple and you have OBAMA.
cashe Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 10:51 AM
Tea Party folks are hilarious. They seem genuinely confused why people say they are racist. I have to believe that they are just too dumb to realize what constitutes racist behavior. Here's a hint. Comparing any black person to a gorilla or chimpanzee is racist.
peter446 Wrote: Aug 01, 2011 7:34 AM
Not if he really resembles a primate,....it is no more racist than the more pigmented folks calling caucasions "cracker, white bread, honkie, pastie, gringo, etc" If it is OK for one side to use slanderous terms based on race than it is just as "OK" for the other side. It is just not politically correct and I have had enough of that whole concept which is based on nothing but racism. Afirmative Action be dammed!
Bill35 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 12:46 PM

Even after 2 major economic disasters, 9/11 and Katrina, Bush had us at 4.6% unemployment before the Dems took the majorities in both houses of Congress on Jan. 3, 2007.

Congress, by law, controls the purse-strings.
11 months after the Dems took the majorities in Congress the country went into recession.

Then President Rubberstamp got in and super-sized the Dem's mess.

We need to remember the old adage, "It's the economy, stupid.", let that really sink in, and then do something about it.

Romney leads the national polls by double digits while Owebummer's poll numbers sink daily.

Romney has great business sense, turn-around experience, he's not a lawyer, and he's not a career politician.

Romney/Rice and a Repub-controlled Congress
Bill35 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:02 PM

The White House is going to be a battle and a half. The DNC lost the house and are set to lose the Senate, so they will pull all the stops to retain the White House, even pulling Sillary Clinton out of their hat and throwing Owebummer under the bus if they have to.

We need someone who can garner from the middle too, and Romney can.

Conservatives need to see the big picture - back Romney to the balls, and give him a conservative Congress.
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:18 PM
A GREAT interview with Romney:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lAFfLy05_Y
Dorthy Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 9:41 AM
When the Dems took over in 2006 they set out to destroy America.
Florida Jim2 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 11:09 AM
We will never recover from the Obama administration undercover, insidious regulations and endless lies being told us e.g. " this Reid bill will reduce spending by $2.5 trillion dollars over ten years" lie, lie, lie! This is just like Obamacare will save us" trillions" it is a fiction and digs the hole deeper for some brave president to tackle the true debt asnd end wasteful spending to save America. We do not seem to produce such a person unless it is Christie? It certainly isn't Obama or anyone in his past or that he knows.
Barak Ochimpo Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 11:38 AM
Florida, Christie isn't what he appears to be. Yeah, he's tough and cuts through a lot of the bulls.it, but when push comes to shove he is not really a man of deep principle like, say a Mark Rubio or women like Palin and Bachmann who will NEVER cave to these Soros/Alinsky Marxists now trying to take over America.
WS2005 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 12:12 PM
I asked you a question about your screen name.... . It has nothing to do with race, right? It's all in my head.
LouLouise Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:11 PM
Barak Ochimp is free to select any screen name he wants.
Get it?
P143 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 6:21 PM
"Mark Rubio or women like Palin and Bachmann who will NEVER cave" Lmao! WOW! You people are really SAD! Palin OUIT! Do you understand that moron? If thats not caving then what is? Bachmann has Nver brought a bill to the floor just speeches for you idiots to get behind as she takes all the government goodies for her self and her family but tells american family's NO! You can't have. Rubio is a BUM! No more to say!
Cal29 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 8:58 PM
Then L your A off, if you, assuming you have one.
Laura458 Wrote: Jul 31, 2011 10:46 AM
I'm for Allen West..yes, he is not running, yet, but those of us who believe in him are working at convincing him to do so. He spent 22 years in the military, and understands what needs to be done about the economy. Learn more about him at www.allenwestforpresident.us
John1849 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 10:48 AM
The next election syndrome is what got us into this mess. We are always voting on what they are going to do rather than what they did or are doing.

We all seem to have amnesia.
Parker01 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 10:35 AM
I could find some of the comments here to be laughable were it not for the 'seriousness' of some. The suggestion (from leftists no less) that the military overthrow the established government for the purpose of imposing their idea of right and wrong? And then there are some on the right who advocate the same thing? And yet, in the face of this the same people decry Christianity as a philosophy which is predicated upon the concept of, "telling others what to do." Not only are some of you confused, you are simply idiots and do not even see how convoluted and confused you are.
Good grief!
Sage Advice3 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 11:30 AM
Parker are you smoking crack? If you wish to excrete a stinky like your above, learn to be specific. Learn to call a spade a spade. Knock it off with these generalizations.
Satan2Liberals Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 8:45 AM
The non-teaparty republicans need to be replaced just like most of us replaced our wood burning stoves. Better alternatives are available and affordable.

We could have an entirely new party in 6yrs.
Sage Advice3 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 11:33 AM
What, the Anarchy Party? I wished you Pauliac POS would catch a clue. We real Americans are on to your regressive, nation destroying rhetoric. Your progressive suckbuddies want to destroy America via turning it into a single nation state (statism) while you maniacal Pauliacs want to destroy it by transforming it into 300 million individual fiefdoms (total and complete anarchy).

BTW: WinstonjQuery15207410854949287116_1312039480187

z
Satan2Liberals Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:32 PM
Please make up your mind , am I a regressive or a progressive , since you accused me of being both in the same post?
Sage Advice3 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 11:34 AM
What, the Anarchy Party? I wished you Pauliac POS would catch a clue. We real Americans are on to your regressive, nation destroying rhetoric. Your progressive suckbuddies want to destroy America via turning it into a single nation state (statism) while you maniacal Pauliacs want to destroy it by transforming it into 300 million individual fiefdoms (total and complete anarchy).

BTW: WinstonjQuery15207410854949287116_1312039480188

z
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 11:55 AM
Correct. The leftist republican party (and their mouths Hannity, Levin, Rush, Beck, Medved, Coulter, Orielly, etc) are hammering the American public with their daily propaganda to TRICK them into thinking there are ONLY two options and they MUST SUBMIT to the R, in order to "survive." When, of course, we have the well-established Constitution Party and Libertarian Party, BOTH of which are OPPOSITES of the leftist republican party and TOTALLY IN LINE with original The American View. When presented with this reality, many leftist republicans will awkwardly conjure visions of lawlessness (or anarchy)... when IN REALITY... THEY, THEMSELVES, and their republican party ARE THE DEFINITION OF LAWLESS ANARCHY! What I find exciting, is the way...
Satan2Liberals Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:39 PM
I'm sorry if reality offends you but our ballot and the debate process work systematically to marginalize 3rd parties into powerlessness despite any hint of veracity of the message.
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 3:39 PM
Acknowledging the problem is the first step toward the remedy. And we are post-tea, so EVERYTHING'S changed. Ron Paul's suddenly popular message of liberty is proof.
Ray from Bloombergia Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 8:23 AM
Replace Bonehead Boehner the limp-wristed RINO with Michele Bachmann and WATCH OUT!!!

Ray from Bloombergia
NRA Life Member
Soli Deo Gloria!!!
jy22 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 7:56 AM
Speak for yourselves! I am a proud member of the Tea Party Movement and have been to DC multiple times, protesting what I think is the fiscal irresponsibility of this administration. I have donated hundreds of dollars to Michele Bachmann and have a tremendous amount of respect for her. That said, I would NOT support her for president now, and probably not in the future as I think SHE and the TOTALLY non-compromising ideologues are doing a tremendous amount of damage to our movement. ANyone who says that they will not raise the debt limit NO MATTER WHAT is just as irresponsible as Obama. (WHen she uttered this statement, she didn't know the amount of the cuts. I know it is highly unlikely, but they could have been 10 Trillion $ for...
Courage and freedom Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 8:21 AM
When you leftys pretend to be tea party members to try and get your way you always tip your hand and expose yourself with your same old name calling and liberal tatics. You are not now or ever were a tea party member.
Sage Advice3 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 11:43 AM
donny, the only reason you might point to jy22 as a "lefty" would be due to your point of relative measure. For no doubt if you see what jy22 is offering to be, "liberal tactics".......Ron Paul clearly has you slammed hard to the right rail while he's corn holing you. And, you are apparently enjoying yourself.
BrotherWinstonSmith Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 12:05 PM
As a REAL Constitutional Libertarian Tea Partier (not FAKE-TEA GOP), I see you seem to reject the very thing I DEMAND! America IS NOT a democracy... so even if I represent a meaningless little .001% of America, I STILL DEMAND THE CONSTITUTION BE FOLLOWED! I WILL NOT SUBMIT TO THE LAWLESS DESIRES OF A MAJORITY!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL NOT SUBMIT to their LAWLESS SCHEMES to keep their lawless gravy train a' rollin'.

Boehner is a leftist. He has proven this over and over for 20 years, which is why he gets booed at local tea parties.
Bachmann is a war-mongering interventionist and a police-stater who seems to have COMPLETE DISREGARD for our 4th Amendment.
NEITHER are "tea party" and NEITHER have any respect for our founding docs.

I hope we stop...
Wendy60 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 4:29 PM
jy22, I must say that you are a moron. First, Boehner hasn't moved things incrementally. He offered the Democrats all the extra spending they wanted, 2.4 T, when we wanted 0. By my math, a compromise" would consist of 1.2T. Not acceptable when the BBA doesn't go with it. Where is the "increment," jy22?

Second, if no one is demanding zero extra spending, then what is the anchor around which Boehner is to deal? It is the Tea Party's job to demand more than we can get so that the GOP has room to negotiate and move things in the right direction. The Tea Party should be seen as an asset for this reason alone.

The left operates this way and has for over a century. If you do not understand this concept, if you think that the Republican Party...
climber Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 4:33 PM
I agree with jy22 completely. This is very similar to the government shutdown when Clinton and Gingrich were in office. The Republicans took the blame and it helped Clinton win reelection. The long-term debt problem will not be solved as long as Obama or any other Dem is in the White House. The overreaching goal must be to defeat him.
Jerry107 Wrote: Aug 02, 2011 2:07 AM
There are NO CUTS in current, real time, today spending!!!!!!!! There are reductions in the RATE OF GROWTH for future spending. The term CUT is a LIE!
libertybel4 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 7:09 AM
Anyone naive or corrupt enough to make a compromise with Obama and the Dems is more liberal than conservative. Boehner should be replaced with a Tea Party conservative who is true to the principles and the best interests of the American people.

It's also disappointing that a few House Tea Party congressmen caved to Boehner's deal. They too should be replaced, as they betrayed the trust of the people who elected them.
VermontAmerican Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 7:32 AM
My belief is that Democrats and Establishment Republicans are banking on a backlash against House Tea Partiers who back Boehner's Plan. Democrats can hold them up in 2012 as betraying their constituents. Establishment Republicans resent their being in Congress. Just look at what McCain said about them. RINOs, Insiders, and Lib/Mod Republicans want D.C. business as usual. Fiscally responsible Tea Partiers put a kink in all that.
M10 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 7:08 AM
Well I think your jumping the gun there Freshman....Boehner is a hellava lot better than Nancy and while he may not have gotten everything in his bills that you would like, your calling to replace himjQuery152017042811367299282_1312023360286?
Nothing like cutting off the hands of an allied party member.

I am very pleased to see the Tea Party member sticking to their campaign promises though, that's an exciting change, just hope you can continue too!
Troy152 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 6:55 AM
The tea party got some attention in this crisis,from now own things will be a little different.The whole world knows the tea party can and will make a difference.The tea party voices was heard,before they was just a talking point,now they are a force to be dealt with.Might not have won the war but in the future they will not be taken for granted.
Am I The Only One? Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 8:06 AM
Troy; How long do you think it will take for the Tea Party members to gain Enough Control of the Republican Party so they can Make That Difference?

2012?.....2014?.....2016?.....2018?.......How about 20-20, Maybe Things Will Look Clear By Then?

I don't think America will be America, in couple more years!....Read My Post about the Tea Party Just Below This One!..............................Thanks!
VermontAmerican Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 6:53 AM
Republicans have to do what's right for America and stop the political posturing for the presidential elections in 2012. As a matter of fact, if they do what's right for America first and foremost (stop the Democrats' wild spending spree), they'll be better positioned to take the White House and Senate as a residuary result. If they want to encourage more Democrat spending by raising the debt ceiling, they're not fit to lead as they're just contributing to the problems we now face as a result of Obama, Reid and Pelosi's binge spending.
Am I The Only One? Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 3:25 AM
I have sent emails out to different Tea Party Groups over a year, and told them that:"Although I support their movement, the Tea Party Movement will end up Failed Movement because of the vehicle,(the republican party), that they have choosen to Make A Real-Impact on Our Government!"

Joining Half-The-Problem in Washington was Only Going to Delute Their Voices, Their Power, and what they want to do in Government!..Now that they are "Tea Flavored Republicans,they find they Can't Do Achieve what they WantedTo Do?

I recently sent another email to a very popular Tea Party Group, and Again suggesting that they should leave the Republicans and run as Non-Partisan Candidates in 2012, because Political Parties have Ruined Our Nation!..I even...
Am I The Only One? Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 1:23 PM
I''M NOT THE ONE WHO IS LOST AND LOOKING FOR A NEW LEADER TO GUIDE THEM?

I KNOW IN WHOM I SEVER!.....AND WHERE MY LIVE WILL LEAD ME!

THE 'TEA PARTY' ARE THE ONES THAT WERE MORE THAN WILLING TO FOLLOW A GROUP WITH A LONG HISTORY OF THEIR OWN, FOR UNCONTROLLED $PENDING, AND BEING "WARNED" , IN ADVANCED, NOT TO DO IT!

ISN'T THAT KIND OF LIKE:"THE CLUELESS FOLLOWING TO BLIND?"
Bill35 Wrote: Jul 30, 2011 2:37 AM

Ugly faces give ugly results - most Dems are ugly.

And the supposed 'Blue Dog Dems' are too fat and/or stupid for America - they wouldn't last a day in the private sector, yet they live like kings in the D'bag marxist system they create.

« Previous1234Next »