It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Big Government is Misspending, and Our Children Are Paying

Big Government is Misspending, and Our Children Are Paying

Guest post  by Daniel Doherty

According to the Washington-based National Council on Teacher Quality, the Los Angeles Unified School District – the second largest school system in the nation – has wasted more than $500 million a year on a failed strategy to improve student performance.

The policy, as reported by the Los Angeles Times, uses 25% of its teacher payroll ($519 million annually) to subsidize graduate coursework, the idea being that higher degrees will translate directly into greater achievement and elevated test scores. Yet the success of the policy has been inconclusive at best.

While the strategy reported by the National Council on Teacher Quality has been ostensibly ineffective, several critics have emphatically disagreed with the report’s findings.  Nevertheless, the story underscores the potentially catastrophic ramifications of implementing failed strategies in our public schools in pursuit of improving student achievement.

Kate Walsh, the president of the National Council on Teacher Quality, asserts that the money would be best spent on teachers who showcase results, thereby creating an incentive for teachers to work harder and foster a classroom that is more conducive to learning. As it stands, a system that rewards teachers in terms of seniority rather than performance is an archaic method that has directly contributed to our stagnant educational system.  

But we can do better.  Since the 1960s, student achievement has faltered to the point that it is now becoming essentially impossible for our children to compete in a continually growing market economy.  

Do we really want to continue down this path?  Merit-based pay, a sensible approach, is one shrewd way to begin reforming our schools.

Moreover, the power and political clout of teachers unions has debilitated many of our school systems.  Apathetic and underperforming teachers cannot be fired, and as always, it is the student that suffers.   One appeal of the charter school movement – and there are many things to like about it – is that it eliminates the perennial practice of tenure and allows the best teachers to flourish.   

Over the years, it has become increasingly apparent that our tax payer dollars are perpetually wasted on public education whereas those countries around the world with infinitely less government spending on education are garnering exponentially higher results.   

With so much money wasted, it's clear that it’s not a lack of money that’s the problem, it’s the way we spend it.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement