The Graham Platner Nazi Tattoo Story Just Got Worse
Wait, Did Trump Just Clinch a Deal With Iran?
Black Commentator Has the Solution for the 'White People Problem' in America
Florida Supreme Court Hands Dems a Massive Loss in Fight Over New Congressional...
This Guy Wanted Jerry Seinfeld to Say 'Free Palestine' After the Knicks Game....
Hakeem Jeffries Wants to Focus on the Economy but His Fellow Democrats Are...
Lawrence O'Donnell Backs Iran Over U.S.; Bill Kristol Frets a Trump Takeover of...the...
Democrats Can’t Even Admit CA Elections Aren’t Secure, and That’s the Real Problem
This Move From The AMA Could Make Having A Baby Even More Pricey
Contractors, Execs Pay $21.3M to Settle Fraud Scheme Targeting Disabled Veteran Business P...
Two Former Utah Court Clerks Arrested for Allegedly Helping Illegal Alien Escape ICE
Former Staffer for Abdul El-Sayed's Senate Campaign Charged in University of Michigan Thre...
Brooklyn Daycare Director Allegedly Stole $2.75M to Fund WWE Trips, Luxury Goods
Reflection Pool Renovators Got a Special Treat From Trump As the Capital Prepares...
Virginia Grocery Store Owner Sentenced to Nearly 3 Years for $2.1 Million Food...
Tipsheet

John Fund Predicts ...

John Fund Predicts ...
Yesterday I attended an event featuring The Wall Street Journal's John Fund, who gave a fascinating talk about his book "Stealing Elections".

Fund is always an entertaining and insightful speaker, and on this occasion, he made two predictions which caught my attention:
Advertisement


1.  Fund predicted that the first bill Obama signs as president will be to mandate national "same day" voter registration.  His reasoning is that the first bill that Bill Clinton signed was "motor voter."  Obviously, this bill would go a long way toward making sure future elections can be stolen by groups like ACORN, etc.

2.  Fund predicted that even if Norm Coleman is certified the winner of the MN senate race over Al Franken, Harry Reid will refuse to seat him. 

As Fund explained, this is not unprecedented; In 1984, the House of Representatives refused to seat Indiana Republican Rick McIntyre who narrowly defeated his Democratic opponent Frank McCloskey by 34 votes -- even though the Republican was certified by the Indiana Secretary of State.  McCloskey ended up winning the seat in 1986.

Under the Constitution, the senate gets to decide who the winner was
Advertisement
.

In short, Harry Reid and the Democrats who control the senate could decide that MN should have counted the rejected absentee ballots which would have elected Franken if counted.

According to Article I, Sec. 5 the senate can choose whom to swear-in -- regardless of who the SoS certifies as the winner:

"Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members"

It will be interesting to see if either of these events occur, but either way, it is wise to anticipate the possibility that history might repeat itself...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement