With Latest Move, Columbia Again Caves to Pro-Terrorism Mob
Another Boeing Whistleblower Has Died
Why Everyone Thinks Biden Had an Accident in Front of the Press Corps
Don Lemon: The DEI Stuff Has Gone Off the Rails
The (Communist) Nerds Are the Bad Guys in This Movie
Trump Campaign Thrashes Biden for Botched Response to Pro-Hamas Unrest
My Favorite Story of the Year (So Far)
Don't Obstruct the Leftist Implosion
No Satisfaction With Stone Age Celebrities Jagger and De Niro
Guess Who's Funding the Pro-Hamas Hate Rallies and Encampments?
University Trash Heaps
Why Do Leftists Hate Israel? (It’s Not What You Think)
The Corruption of Rep. Adam Schiff Is Reaching a Tipping Point
Cringy Mark Hamill PC Shows Need for White House Reform
Expiring Tax Provisions Could Cost Thirty Million American Taxpayers New Accounting Fees
Tipsheet

Pulitzer Prize-Winning Journalist Has an Explanation for That NYT Report on Nord Stream Sabotage

AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

About a month after Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh dropped a bombshell report alleging the Biden administration was behind the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines, The New York Times came out with its own scoop suggesting a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack, according to U.S. officials.

Advertisement

The timing of the release was not lost on foreign policy wonks, coming just days after German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited Washington. 

Now, Hersh claims U.S. and German intelligence agencies ‘fed’ the Times and Germany’s Die Zeit that “false cover story to counter the report.” 

In early March, President Biden hosted German Chancellor Olaf Scholz in Washington. The trip included only two public events—a brief pro forma exchange of compliments between Biden and Scholz before the White House press corps, with no questions allowed; and a CNN interview with Scholz by Fareed Zakaria, who did not touch on the pipeline allegations. The chancellor had flown to Washington with no members of the German press on board, no formal dinner scheduled, and the two world leaders were not slated to conduct a press conference, as routinely happens at such high-profile meetings. Instead, it was later reported that Biden and Scholz had an 80-minute meeting, with no aides present for much of the time. There have been no statements or written understandings made public since then by either government, but I was told by someone with access to diplomatic intelligence that there was a discussion of the pipeline exposé and, as a result, certain elements in the Central Intelligence Agency were asked to prepare a cover story in collaboration with German intelligence that would provide the American and German press with an alternative version for the destruction of Nord Stream 2. In the words of the intelligence community, the agency was “to pulse the system” in an effort to discount the claim that Biden had ordered the pipelines’ destruction. (Seymour Hersh)

Advertisement

Despite the Biden administration denouncing Hersh's initial reporting as "completely and utterly false," the journalist continues to stand by his work. 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement