President Trump Reveals What We All Suspected About the 2020 Election in Primetime...
Peggy Flanagan Wants to Make Kids Whole. She Can Start With Kids Harmed...
As AG, Todd Blanche Will Finally Seek Justice for Dems' Dirty Lawfare
JD Retreat
Is It Possible Hollywood Is Losing Its Itch to Please LGBTQ Lobbyists?
Why We Need the SAVE America Act
Lindsey Graham, Politician and Churchillian
America Is in Trouble and Running Out of Time
Radical-Chic Immigration Beliefs Cost an American Woman Her Life
A Second Chance for American Health—and American Farmers
The Billionaires Who Built Platner
In Defense of Data Centers
A Maryland School Lied to Parents. Twice.
Trump Declassifies Election Documents: Here's What We Know So Far
Two Seattle-Area Men Sentenced for Trafficking Drugs Near Homeless Encampments
Tipsheet

Obama Admin: Requiring Employees in US Speak English Is Discriminatory

Obama Admin: Requiring Employees in US Speak English Is Discriminatory

Under new rules put forth by the Obama administration, it’s now considered discriminatory for companies in the U.S. to require that employees speak English, but it’s OK to require that workers speak a foreign language.

Advertisement

The new enforcement guideline is meant to crack down on “national origin discrimination” in the workplace, because according to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the American workforce is “increasingly ethnically diverse.”

“The increased cultural diversity of today’s workplaces presents new and evolving issues with respect to Title VII’s protection against national origin discrimination,” the EEOC writes. “This enforcement guidance will assist EEOC staff in their investigation of national origin discrimination charges and provide information for applicants, employees, and employers to understand their respective rights and responsibilities under Title VII.”

So how did this rule come about? Judicial Watch breaks it down:

Two years ago, the administration laid the foundation for the new measures by suing a private American business for discriminating against Hispanic and Asian employees because they didn’t speak English on the job. The case involved a Green Bay Wisconsin metal and plastic manufacturer that fired a group of Hmong and Hispanic workers over their English skills. Forcing employees to speak English in the U.S. violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC claimed in its lawsuit. That’s because the Civil Rights Act protects employees from discrimination based on national origin, which includes the linguistic characteristics of a national origin group. Therefore, the EEOC argued, foreigners have the right to speak their native language even during work hours at an American company that requires English.

Advertisement

Related:

DISCRIMINATION

Also included in the rules are new discrimination categories such as using Social Security requirements to screen applicants and relying on “word-of-mouth recruiting,” which the EEOC states could “magnify existing ethnic, racial or religious homogeneity in a workplace and result in the exclusion of qualified applicants from different national origin groups.”

According to Judicial Watch, the enforcement guidelines are another example of the Obama administration “strong-arm[ing] businesses and government agencies into adopting [their] leftist agenda and inflated standards of political correctness.” 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement