Is Hollywood Unwokening?
Columbia University Offers Soft Deadline for Pro-Hamas Students to Dismantle Their Encampm...
Capitalism Versus Racism
Groupthink Chorus Emerges at Trump Trial
Anti-Censorship Group Canceled by Pro-Hamas Authors
Mike Johnson Is a Hero
City Where Emergency Response Time Is 36 Minutes Wants to Ban Civilians Carrying...
There's No Right to Sleep Outdoors
State Department: Ukraine Has 'Significant' Human Rights Issues
The Alarming Implications of Trump's Immunity Claim
In Every Generation They Try to Destroy Us
Love to See It: Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Ted Cruz Fight to Protect Public...
1968 Returns as Biden’s Nightmare
The Greatest Challenge to DeSantis' Legacy in Florida
Senate Passes Foreign Aid Package, Sending It to President Biden to Sign
Tipsheet

HHS Responds to Pressure From ACLU: 'No Constitutional Right' for Illegal Immigrant Minor to Obtain Abortion

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) sued the Trump administration on Friday on behalf of an immigrant minor, named only as Jane Doe, who came to the country illegally and has been denied access to an abortion by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) in a shelter in Brownsville, Texas. ORR released a statement Tuesday emphasizing that the minor has no "constitutional right" to an abortion.

Advertisement

ORR informed Politico Tuesday that they are “providing excellent care to this young woman and her unborn child and fulfilling our duty to the American people. There is no constitutional right for a pregnant minor to illegally cross the U.S. border and get an elective abortion while in federal custody."

"We cannot cede our responsibility to care for minors and their babies by releasing them to ideological advocacy groups," they add.

“There is a pattern of unconstitutional overreach of power in a minor’s abortion decision,” the ACLU lawyer on the case, Brigitte Amiri claims.

The ACLU attempted to join the minor’s case last week with a separate lawsuit against religious groups, such as the USCCB, that provide care to immigrants but do not provide or refer them to abortions.

They argued in that request for a preliminary injunction in San Francisco Court that this policy is unconstitutional because it prevents minors, including the one in this most recent case who is referenced as Jane Doe, from exercising their “fundamental constitutional right to an abortion.”

The judge denied the request, arguing that she couldn't hear Doe's case because the girl is in Texas. However, the judge also said that "the government has no business blocking Jane Doe's abortion."

Advertisement

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who filed an amicus curiae brief on the side of the federal government in the ACLU’s earlier case, said a ruling to allow the minor an abortion would create a dangerous precedent.

“No federal court has ever declared that unlawfully-present aliens with no substantial ties to this country have a constitutional right to abortion on demand,” Paxton pointed out in a statement. “If ‘Doe’ prevails in this case, the ruling will create a right to abortion for anyone on earth who enters the U.S. illegally. And with that right, countless others undoubtedly would follow. Texas must not become a sanctuary state for abortions.”

Paxton said that “Texas has a legitimate and substantial interest in preserving and promoting fetal life, as well as an interest in promoting respect for human life at all stages in a pregnancy.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement