It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

NYC: No Big Gulps But Morning After Pills For Teenagers Are Fine

NYC: No Big Gulps But Morning After Pills For Teenagers Are Fine

NYC Mayor Mike Bloomberg's "Big Gulp" ban, a ban on sugary drinks over 16 ounces in size, has been in the news for over a month now. Just last week, the NYC health board voted to put the ban into place. Today that same health board voted to allow the distribution of Plan B, or the morning after pill, to teenage girls without parental consent.
 

Advertisement

 

Hadley Heath over at the Independent Women's Forum, said this in response:

It's clear what the advantages will be: In New York City, about 7,000 girls get pregnant each year.  This disrupts their education, and half of these pregnancies end in abortion.  I'm sure the thought is that offering "Plan B" to students will reduce the number of unexpected pregnancies at school.  

But there are two sides to every coin:

This pill is not a piece of candy.  There are real health-related questions about making it available to 14 year olds.  Remember, it's called "Plan B," and is intended for occasional use.  I'd hate to think of immature students using it instead as "Plan A," unneccessarily flushing their developing bodies with these hormones too frequently.  Yes, I know the FDA says it's safe.  But it certainly isn't best.  This could mean that students reduce their condom use, too, which could expose them to a higher risk of contracting an STD.

Furthermore, think about what this means culturally about the value of sexual intimacy.  Is it too much to ask of high schoolers to focus on their studies and enjoy being kids?  And by making "Plan B" available at school - from the nurse - aren't we cutting out an important middleman, the parent?

Advertisement

Heath is right. For years the left has tried to cut parents out of the school system. Whether it's expanding the school day (which hasn't turned into smarter kids or better test scores) or providing Plan B to children without parental notification.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos