Immigration Judge Blocks DHS Effort to Deport Student for Criticizing Israel
US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
FBI Releases Images of Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Scott Jennings: Democrats Are Losing the Voter ID Argument
Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
While Homeless New Yorkers Freeze, the NYT Wants Us to Know This About...
Sen. Warren Repeats Debunked Lie About Women and the SAVE Act
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
Latest Leftist Stupid: Trump Abolished Second Amendment
Welcome to California: Inside CA's Homelessness Crisis With Nick Shirley
Trump Is Set to Make the 'Largest Act of Deregulation in the History'
Steve Hilton Isn’t Even Governor Yet, and He’s Already Exposing California Welfare Fraud
Tipsheet

Of Course: Obama Says Israel Speech "Misrepresented"

As fallout continues over President Obama's calls for Israel to go back to its 1967 borders last week, Obama, as usual, is claiming his speech was "misrepresented."

Advertisement

Claiming his remarks earlier this week on borders for Israel and a future Palestinian state had been misrepresented, President Obama said Sunday that "1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps" means the two sides will "negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967."

In remarks Sunday to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the president tried to explain his earlier position to a warm but occasionally tentative crowd by saying that his speech Thursday at the State Department didn't offer anything new or provocative in the way of peace negotiations.

"There was nothing particularly original in my proposal; this basic framework for negotiations has long been the basis for discussions among the parties, including previous U.S. administrations," he said

"What I did on Thursday was to say publicly what has long been acknowledged privately," he added, saying his remarks were no different than a "well-known formula" that has been worked on for a generation.

"It allows the parties themselves to account for the changes that have taken place over the last 44 years, including the new demographic realities on the ground and the needs of both sides. The ultimate goal is two states for two peoples. Israel as a Jewish state and the homeland for the Jewish people, and the state of Palestine as the homeland for the Palestinian people; each state enjoying self-determination, mutual recognition, and peace," he said.

Since Thursday, tensions between the U.S. and Israel have been sharper than ever. The remarks -- in which the president said he wants Israel and the Palestinians to negotiate a land deal that starts with the 1967 borders -- received considerable criticism, including a public dressing down by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Advertisement

It seems that the President of the United States shouldn't have to "clarify" remarks given in a major foreign policy speech, yet over and over again we see this Administration clarifying controversial remarks when issues get heated.

Taking into account Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's response to the calls for 1967 borders, it was quite clear what message President Obama sent to the Jewish State last week. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos