It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Liberal Attacks on the Supreme Court Just Reached New Levels

Liberal Attacks on the Supreme Court Just Reached New Levels
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

New York Times editorial board member Mara Gay claimed the far-right is now being represented by the Supreme Court as Senate Democrats try to come up with ways to "reign in" the supposed "rouge" court because they have issued rulings they do not like.  

Advertisement

"In this moment in American history the far-right in the country, which includes several members of the Supreme Court at this point, is far less interested I believe, unfortunately, in precedent and in democratic institutions and far more interested in raw power," Gay warned.

"And I think what’s interesting about this op-ed to me is it’s straight out of the right-wing playbook at this point," she continued. "Throw out an extreme idea that is anathema to everything that any American who has been to a high school social studies class would recognize as the importance of the balance and checks of power, and then get Americans used to it so by the time you’ve decided that Congress, despite Section 3 of the Constitution, has absolutely no role in altering or regulating the court, then Americans will accept that, as though it was true all along."

The Wall Street Journal recently interviewed Justice Samuel Alito, who said the recent attacks against the Court have reached preposterous proportions:

Advertisement

Related:

SUPREME COURT

'I marvel at all the nonsense that has been written about me in the last year,' Justice Samuel Alito says during an early July interview at the Journal’s New York offices. In the face of a political onslaught, he observes, 'the traditional idea about how judges and justices should behave is they should be mute' and leave it to others, especially 'the organized bar,' to defend them. 'But that’s just not happening. And so at a certain point I’ve said to myself, nobody else is going to do this, so I have to defend myself.'


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement