Alan Grayson's Creepy, Creepy Political Ad

Jillian Bandes
Blogger, Townhall.com

I've long been of the opinion that Grayson is the worst Member of Congress. Period. This advertisment just reinforces my prejudices.

What is with Democrats using children to make their point?

Jillian Bandes

Jillian Bandes is the National Political Reporter for Townhall.com

Breaking on TOWNHALL

Join the Debate

14 Comments So Far

Orlando Tea Party Wrote: Sep 15, 2010 7:12 PM

You know what else is creepy? The big prominent YELLOW Democratic front ad that appears on this website every day. PEG DUNMIRE is a 3rd party candidate NOT supported by the Florida Tea Party, and we have been trying to get that add of of this site for over a month!!!!!!!! See http://orlandoteaparty.com where you can find the telephone numbers of the people who can explain the scandal happening in Orlando between Alan Grayson and the TEA Party (political party formed by a DEMOCRAT!!!)

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Diane279 Wrote: Oct 06, 2010 11:23 PM

Cheryl you are simple! For one you spell ad - ad not add! Two Peg Dunmire is 100% more of a human than you and 3. you are going to get surprised on Nov 2 and it won't be your wimpy boy Webster or Gross Grayson - there are more out there for Dunmire than you can count - we just do not flap our jowls like you all the time and Peg Dunmire's money is better than the boys - she earned it - not take it from the tax payers.

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

BK22 Wrote: Sep 10, 2010 9:10 AM

This idiot needs a foot up his a$$!

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Dan2015 Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 11:30 PM

Democrat candidates and office holders use children as cheap props to make their point because they view all of us as children who need to be taken care of by our betters, ie: them, and they are hoping that we will view ourselves as children who need to be taken care of.

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Kenny Z Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 1:12 PM

That could be because grayson is a creep!

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

vladimir estragon Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 12:53 PM

Right. Republicans NEVER use children to make their point. I mean, can you imagine a Republican president or vice presidential candidate bringing their CHILDREN out at a national convention? Horrors!

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 10:11 AM

NeoConScum,
How could you NOT vote for this gentleman?
He saved your skools in Orlando. Now his 5 kids have a place to learn.
Wow...you must be proud and honored to have him.
BTW, are you going to partake in the children's choir presentation of:
"OBAMA...OBAMA...OBAMA..."?
At the very least, it would be the respectable thing to do.

Life must be beautiful there...

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

albert henry Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 1:01 PM

clarityseeker

Vlad to Boxers aid; "give me a hit man, this is good sh!t, and that grayson dude, way cool"

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

vladimir estragon Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 1:22 PM

Democrats use children to make political points. Republicans use them for sex.

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

There are More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All

arch16 Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 3:52 PM

You horrible creep Vlad! Post your evidence or Shut your yap!

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Bill4499 Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 5:09 PM

This is Vlad, not Bill.

Mark Foley
Ted Haggard
Glenn Murphy

Ask me a DIFFICULT question next time.

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Bill4499 Wrote: Sep 09, 2010 5:46 PM

Actually, far more children and young people have been "used" and bused by DUMBOCRAPS:

Mel Reynolds (D) Illionois serving time for his multiple felonies
Gerry Studds
Barney Frank---running a male prostitution ring from his home---young boys involved
Gary Condit
Bill Clinton
James McGreevey
Eliot Spitzer
Jerry Springer
Brock Adams
Wilbur Mills
Walter Jenkins
Ted Kennedy
Wayne Hays
Strom Thurmond
Far too many more to count...

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

socalcon Wrote: Sep 10, 2010 2:53 AM

Vlad, you know I hate to correct you, but as I recall, Haggard and Murphy's indiscretions were with adults.

not that this forgives them, but the topic was on using 'children'.

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

socalcon Wrote: Sep 10, 2010 2:57 AM

Also, Foley's sending "sexually laced, grammatically challenged instant messages and e-mails to teenaged boys in the Congressional page program for more than 10 years." was emotional abuse but was this "sex" per se? Sexual in nature, certainly, but not sex- as most humans would catagorize it. (Arch and you have posted racier items hear on TH, and I'd doubt you'd say it was 'being used for sex'.

Permalink

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

New comments on this article - click to refresh

Allahpundit	Quotes of the day
J.E. Dyer	Contraception mandate: MSM stuck in “narrative capture”?
Tina Korbe	Sarah Palin at CPAC: The door is open …
Tina Korbe	Sheriff Paul Babeau: Fast and Furious scandal is far from over
Ed Morrissey	Breaking: Romney wins CPAC straw poll
Patrick Ishmael	Hot Air Survey: CPAC Edition

Townhall The Tipsheet Jillian Bandes

Alan Grayson's Creepy, Creepy Political Ad

Jillian Bandes

Sign-Up to receive Updates from TH

Breaking on TOWNHALL

Video