CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and Some Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
This Is How Mike Johnson Will Stop Lawmakers From Challenging Trump's Tariffs
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Wisconsin High School Is Hosting a Drag Show. Guess Who's Participating.
You Are the Carbon They Want to Reduce: WEF 'Sustainability' Leftist Wants to...
FBI Releases Images of Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Even Jimmy Kimmel Is Mocking the Left for Their Sudden Love of Bad...
Welcome to California: Inside CA's Homelessness Crisis With Nick Shirley
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

Climategate Scientists "Cleared of Dishonest Behavior"

Phil Jones, the climate scientist at the University of East Anglia, has been cleared of any dishonest behavior after the Climategate email scandal that forced him to leave his post.
Advertisement
The emails that were leaked from his office talked about using a "trick" to interpret date to make it appear that temperatures were rising faster than they actually were. They also referred to the death of one of his scientific opponents — a climate change skeptic — as "cheering news."

The official investigators who cleared Jones complained that he did not comply with information requests as quickly as they would like. But in the end, that didn't matter, according to statements one official made to The Guardian:
Ultimately this has to be about what they did, not what they said...The honesty and rigour of CRU as scientists are not in doubt ... We have not found any evidence of behaviour that might undermine the conclusions of the IPCC assessments.

The only slap on the wrist came from CRU's controversial 1999 graph for the World Meteorological Organization, the subject of Jones' "trick" science. Because of creative labeling techniques, the decline in temperature decline was hidden. Notations were made "in the report text" explaining the labeling techniques, but that text didn't make it out to the general public, of course. At least the investigators picked up on that.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos