Democrats Say 'Heil Platner!'
Guess Who Melted Down on CNN Regarding the FBI Raid on a Top...
So, After All of Ketanji Brown Jackson's Whining About the Voting Rights Act...
Barack Obama Is Very Disappointed That We Haven't Lived Up to His Expectations
Trump Effect: South Carolina and Tennessee Are Drawing New Maps
Here's What the Suspect Who Pulled a Gun Near the White House Said...
Is This Jeffrey Epstein's Suicide Note?
The LA City Council Just Made Driving in the City More Dangerous
Democrats Used to Think Jailing Their Political Opponents Was a Joke
Florida CFO Blaise Ingoglia Announces Another Major SNAP Fraud Arrest
Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass Just Lost Big in Court Over the Palisades...
Spencer Pratt Dominated Last Night's L.A. Mayoral Debate
Police Apprehend Suspect in Mass Shooting at Oklahoma Campground
What Happens When Moms Are Missing
Fantasies and the Rest of Us
Tipsheet

Only 6.6% of EPA Employees Considered 'Essential'

Only 6.6% of EPA Employees Considered 'Essential'

As if we didn’t already know how useless and unnecessary the EPA is, following the government shutdown we saw just how little we really need them. When various government agencies were releasing many of their workers on furlough with lack of funding, the EPA went through its employees and decided which were “essential” and which were “non-essential”.

Advertisement

According to an EPA guidance, which Reuters obtained, the agency said it only had 1,069 of its 16,205 employees listed as “essential”. That is only 6.6 percent of their workforce! This guidance, which is used in the event of a government shutdown, also said that “most workers in the Office of Air and Radiation, which is in charge of writing and implementing most of the EPA’s major air pollution rules,” would be furloughed.

Why is it that we have an agency that could run on less than 7 percent of current staff? To be clear that means more than 9 out of every 10 employees at the EPA are non-essential.

Although this government shutdown may not be considered as the greatest way to get through funding differences, perhaps there is a silver lining here. When agencies are forced to go through their list of employees and whether they are integral to the organization’s work it seems we get quite a sneak peek into how we could gut and cut the government bureaucracy. Is it just me, or should all employees be essential in order to remain at their jobs? This could be a good way to go forward with finding places to cut money in the budget.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement